IADR Abstract Archives

Increased Scale Novel Glass Production Effect on Composite Flexural Properties

Objectives: When developing new glasses for resin composites it is important to confirm that scaling up from lab-scale to industrial-scale does not deleteriously effect properties. Here, we compare a lab-made glass with an industrially made glass in terms of composite flexural properties.
Methods: A fluoride glass (37.5 SiO2: 20.4 CaO :20.4 Na2O :5 P2O2 :16.7 NaF, sieved particle size <45μm) was made at <50g scale in our lab and in three batches of 250g scale industrially (GTS, Glass Technology Services, UK). 50:50 urethane dimethacrylate:triethylene glycol dimethacrylate composites (Sigma Aldrich,UK) were made with 20v% our glass and 40v% barium-alumino-borosilicate glass (0,7μm particle size,SCHOTT® UltraFine). Five composites were made, one for each batch and a fifth from the three GTS batches combined.

Degree of conversion (DC) was measured using ATR-FTIR (Spectrum One, Perkin Elmer) (n=5, 6×1mm) exposed to 40s of light (intensity=1000 mW/cm2, Elipar DeepCure, 3M ESPE, UK). Three-point bend test flexural strength (FS) and modulus (FM) specimens (n=10, 5 overlapping 20s light exposures, 25×2×2mm) were stored in distilled water at 37C and properties measured at day 1, 7, 14 and 28 using a universal test machine (model 5567, Instron, UK).
Results: No significant differences in DC were measured (P>0.05, range = 60-69%). Similar behaviour was found for the FS and FM. Initially, all composites had FS above 80MPa and FM above 7.1 GPa, with no significant difference measured (P>0.05). Both parameters then decreased for all composites over time, significantly so for the lab-made glass composites (p<0.05), while no significant differences were found for the scaled-up glass composites (p>0.05).
Conclusions: All composites showed high DC% and good initial mechanical properties. While properties decreased over storage time, the scaled-up glass composites showed superior flexural properties to the lab-based glass composites, suggesting this glass could be suitable for use in an ion-release dental composite.
Division:
Meeting: 2023 IADR/LAR General Session with WCPD
Location:
Year: 2023
Final Presentation ID: 0280
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Dental Materials 2:Polymer-based Materials
Authors
  • Algadhi, Abdulaziz  ( Newcastle University , Newcastle Upon Tyne , United Kingdom )
  • Bretcanu, Oana  ( Newcastle University , Newcastle Upon Tyne , United Kingdom )
  • German, Matthew  ( Newcastle University , Newcastle-upon-Tyne , United Kingdom )
  • Financial Interest Disclosure: NONE
    SESSION INFORMATION
    Interactive Talk Session
    Polymer-based Materials II: Mechanical Properties 1
    Wednesday, 06/21/2023 , 01:15PM - 02:45PM
    TABLES
    Flexural Strength (MPa): Mean (SD)
    DayLabGTS1GTS2GTS3GTS MIX
    182(9) A,a89(9) A,e84(5) A,e87(10) A,e88(10) A,e
    757(5) B,b69(11) C,e69(7) C,e70(10) C,e71(9) C,e
    1449(5) D,c67(8) E,e72(7) E,e74(8) E,e73(6) E,e
    2841(5) F, d68(9) G,e69(10) G,e74(8) G,e70(7) G,e
    Different superscript capital letters denote significant differences between materials Different superscript lower case letters denote significant differences between time. All tests one-way ANCOVA
    Flexural Modulus (GPa): Mean (SD)
    DayLabGTS1GTS2GTS3GTS MIX
    17.1(0.5) Z,z7.7(1.5) Z,x7.6(0.3) Z,x7.8(0.4) Z,x8.1(0.8) Z,x
    75.7(0.5) Y,y6.9(0.3) X,x6.5 (0.9) X,x7.4(0.4) X,x7.3(0.4) X,x
    145.7(0.5) W,y7.5(1) V,x7.1 (0.7) V,x7(0.7) V,x7.4(0.4) V,x
    285.3(0.6) U,y6.9(1.2) T,x6.9(1.2) T,x7.4(1) T,x6.4(2.4) T,x
    Different superscript capital letters denote significant differences between materials Different superscript lower case letters denote significant differences between time. All tests one-way ANCOVA