IADR Abstract Archives

Influence of Filler Load on Microhardness of Bis-GMA, UDMA and Bis-EMA-based Experimental Resin Composites

Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of 3 different filler loads on surface microhardness of Bis-GMA, UDMA and Bis-EMA-based experimental resin composites.
Methods: The organic matrix of experimental composites was prepared in a base monomer and co-monomer ratio of 60:40mol%. The base monomers used were Bis-GMA, UDMA and Bis-EMA with TEGDMA used as a co-monomer. The filler content constituted of silanated barium-glass fillers and Ox-50 silica fillers (90wt% and 10wt% respectively). Three different filler load:organic matrix ratio were used for each of the 3 base monomers: Low filled (50:50wt%), Medium filled (60:40wt%) and High filled (70:30wt%), to create a total of 9 experimental resin composites. Disk-shape molds (2mm thickness and 6mm diameter) were filled with the experimental resin composites (n=2). Top and bottom surfaces were covered with a Mylar strip and photoactivated on the top surface for 40s at 560mW/cm2 irradiance with a light-curing unit. Samples were stored in dry, at room temperature and blocked from ambient light for 24h. Surface microhardness was measured with a microhardness tester using a Knoop diamond indenter under a 50g load with a dwell time of 10s. Three indentations were performed on each sample with a minimum of 1mm of distance between each indentation. For each base monomer, a One-Way ANOVA followed by a Tukey post-hoc test was performed to observe differences between the three filler loads.
Results: See Table 1.
Conclusions: Bis-EMA-based experimental composites benefitted from the increase in filler load, showing a progressive significant increment of surface microhardness from the lowest to the highest filler load evaluated.
Division: IADR/AADR/CADR General Session
Meeting: 2020 IADR/AADR/CADR General Session (Washington, D.C., USA)
Location: Washington, D.C., USA
Year: 2020
Final Presentation ID: 0403
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Dental Materials 2:Polymer-based Materials
Authors
  • Leyva Del Rio, Diana  ( The Ohio State University , Columbus , Ohio , United States )
  • Seghi, Robert  ( The Ohio State University , Columbus , Ohio , United States )
  • Queiroz, Daher  ( The Ohio State University , Columbus , Ohio , United States )
  • Financial Interest Disclosure: NONE
    SESSION INFORMATION
    Oral Session
    Polymer-based Materials: General Properties
    TABLES
    Table 1. Means±SD of Knoop microhardness values
    Experimental
    Composites
    Filler Load
    Base monomer:
    co-monomer
    Low filled
    (50wt%)
    Medium filled
    (60wt%)
    High filled
    (70wt%)
    Bis-GMA:TEGDMA8.53±0.88a10.34±0.64b9.54±1.14ab
    UDMA:TEGDMA20.60±2.54a20.78±4.24a24.29±1.42a
    Bis-EMA:TEGDMA13.44±0.84a19.32±1.63b22.89±1.87c
    Means followed by the same lower-case letters within any row are not statistically different by Tukey’s adjustment (α=0.05).