Influence of Filler Load on Microhardness of Bis-GMA, UDMA and Bis-EMA-based Experimental Resin Composites
Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of 3 different filler loads on surface microhardness of Bis-GMA, UDMA and Bis-EMA-based experimental resin composites. Methods: The organic matrix of experimental composites was prepared in a base monomer and co-monomer ratio of 60:40mol%. The base monomers used were Bis-GMA, UDMA and Bis-EMA with TEGDMA used as a co-monomer. The filler content constituted of silanated barium-glass fillers and Ox-50 silica fillers (90wt% and 10wt% respectively). Three different filler load:organic matrix ratio were used for each of the 3 base monomers: Low filled (50:50wt%), Medium filled (60:40wt%) and High filled (70:30wt%), to create a total of 9 experimental resin composites. Disk-shape molds (2mm thickness and 6mm diameter) were filled with the experimental resin composites (n=2). Top and bottom surfaces were covered with a Mylar strip and photoactivated on the top surface for 40s at 560mW/cm2 irradiance with a light-curing unit. Samples were stored in dry, at room temperature and blocked from ambient light for 24h. Surface microhardness was measured with a microhardness tester using a Knoop diamond indenter under a 50g load with a dwell time of 10s. Three indentations were performed on each sample with a minimum of 1mm of distance between each indentation. For each base monomer, a One-Way ANOVA followed by a Tukey post-hoc test was performed to observe differences between the three filler loads. Results: See Table 1. Conclusions: Bis-EMA-based experimental composites benefitted from the increase in filler load, showing a progressive significant increment of surface microhardness from the lowest to the highest filler load evaluated.
Division:IADR/AADR/CADR General Session
Meeting:2020 IADR/AADR/CADR General Session (Washington, D.C., USA) Location:Washington, D.C., USA
Year: 2020 Final Presentation ID:0403 Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s):Dental Materials 2:Polymer-based Materials
Authors
Leyva Del Rio, Diana
( The Ohio State University
, Columbus
, Ohio
, United States
)
Seghi, Robert
( The Ohio State University
, Columbus
, Ohio
, United States
)
Queiroz, Daher
( The Ohio State University
, Columbus
, Ohio
, United States
)
Financial Interest Disclosure: NONE
SESSION INFORMATION
Oral Session
Polymer-based Materials: General Properties
TABLES
Table 1. Means±SD of Knoop microhardness values
Experimental Composites
Filler Load
Base monomer: co-monomer
Low filled (50wt%)
Medium filled (60wt%)
High filled (70wt%)
Bis-GMA:TEGDMA
8.53±0.88a
10.34±0.64b
9.54±1.14ab
UDMA:TEGDMA
20.60±2.54a
20.78±4.24a
24.29±1.42a
Bis-EMA:TEGDMA
13.44±0.84a
19.32±1.63b
22.89±1.87c
Means followed by the same lower-case letters within any row are not statistically different by Tukey’s adjustment (α=0.05).