IADR Abstract Archives

Root Apex Displacement and Root Resorption (RR) During Orthodontic Treatment

Objectives: Lack of consensus exists regarding the effect of root displacement on RR during orthodontic treatment. Root displacement has been quantified using two-dimensional images. Quantifying treatment-induced root displacement is very difficult using two-dimensional images.
Objectives: To determine the displacement of incisor roots in patients who have received orthodontic treatment with and without extractions.
Methods: Records of 215 consecutively treated patients who received orthodontic treatment with or without extractions were obtained for this study. Displacement of maxillary central incisor root was determined using pre- and post-treatment cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) images using Invivo 5.4. For each patient, either right or left central incisor was randomly chosen to measure the vertical, horizontal and angular displacement of the root (Figure 1) during treatment.
Results: Vertical position of the incisor root as measured by the linear distance between CEJ-PP demonstrated a greater change in the extraction group than non-extraction group. Position of the root apex as measured by Apex-PP distance indicated a greater change in non-extraction group than extraction group (Table1). With similar pre-treatment positions of incisors, the extraction group demonstrated a relatively more tipping compared to the non-extraction group. Change in the angle between long axis of the incisor and palatal plane (PP) during orthodontic treatment demonstrated a large difference between the extraction and non-extraction groups. The extraction group presented with an average pretreatment position of 112.01° with a mean change of -2.54° ± 10.44°. This, in comparison to the non-extraction group which demonstrated a mean change of 8.37°± 7.77°.
Conclusions: Apices of the maxillary incisors moved apically with differing magnitudes and the amount of intrusion in the non-extraction group was more than extraction group. When distance between labial CEJ and PP distance was used an alternative to determine the vertical displacement, roots in the extraction group intruded more than non-extraction group.
IADR/AADR/CADR General Session
2020 IADR/AADR/CADR General Session (Washington, D.C., USA)
Washington, D.C., USA
2020
1805
Craniofacial Biology Research
  • Patel, Jaykishan  ( University of Nebraska Medical Center , Lincoln , Nebraska , United States )
  • Kim, Sung  ( University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Dentistry , Lincoln , Nebraska , United States )
  • Premaraj, Sundaralingam  ( University of Nebraska Medical Center , Lincoln , Nebraska , United States )
  • Premaraj, Thyagaseely  ( University of Nebraska Medical Center , Lincoln , Nebraska , United States )
  • NONE
    Poster Session
    Orthodontic Research
    Table 1. Position of Maxillary Central Incisor Root Apex during Orthodontic Treatment
    DirectionExtraction (E) or Non-extraction (NE)nParameterPre-treatment Position (mm or °) (mean ± SD)Range (mm or °)Change in Position (mm or °) (mean ± SD)Range (mm or °)
    Vertical E92CEJ-PP16.36 ± 2.4210.81-22.22 0.77±1.75-6.33-5.28
     NE96CEJ-PP15.29±2.6910.06-22.830.30±1.28-3.47-2.71
    Vertical E92Apex-PP6.26 ± 2.521.23-13.45 1.41±2.22-2.97-11.36
     NE96Apex-PP4.85±2.511.12-14.061.93±1.90-3.03-7.26
    Horizontal E92Apex-Perp40.25 ± 3.4433.42-49.11 -0.29±2.67-6.70-10.10
     NE96Apex-Perp41.45±3.0434.46-49.59-1.17±2.43-9.68-4.78
    Angular E92LA-PP112.01±8.2589.70-130.40 -2.54±10.14-33.00-22.60
     NE96LA-PP109.57±7.5394.10-133.808.37±7.77-14.20-28.10