IADR Abstract Archives

Radiopacity of an Experimental Universal Adhesive

Objectives: Objectives: Aim of this study was to assess the radiopacity of an experimental universal adhesive (ADH-XTE, 3M) versus commonly used adhesives.
Methods: Methods: Solvents were evaporated from adhesives (ADH-XTE, 3M; ScotchbondTM Universal, SBU, 3M, AdheSETM Universal, ADU, Ivoclar-Vivadent; Prime&BondTM NT, PBNT, Dentsply-Sirona; Prime&Bond ActiveTM, PBA, Dentsply-Sirona; ClearfilTM SE Bond, CSE, Kuraray-Noritake; OptibondTM Solo PlusTM, OSP, Kerr). The remaining liquid was cured in polytetrafluoroethylene moulds (10mm diameter, 1mm height) using an Elipar S10 curing light (3M) to produce disks (n=3). 1mm thick disks of mid-coronal dentin of human molars were prepared using a circular saw (Accutom, Struers, n=3). Radiopacity was determined according to ISO13116:2014, using a Heliodent Plus device (Dentsply-Sirona) and VistaScan digital imaging equipment (Dürr Dental), voltage 60kV.
Class I cavities (4mm deep) were prepared in extracted human molars. Adhesives were applied using a fully saturated disposable applicator according to manufacturers’ instructions, and gently air dried to provoke pooling at the cavity bottom. Cavities were restored with FiltekTM One (3M). Radiographs of teeth were taken using above equipment and examined for radiolucent areas underneath the fillings.
Results: Results: The table shows the radiopacity in % of aluminium, and the occurrence of radiolucent areas under the restorations. Standard deviations (SD) are given in parentheses. Radiopacity data were analyzed by ANOVA and multiple comparisons using the Tukey test (p<0.05). Means with the same letters are statistically the same.
Conclusions: Conclusion: ADH-XTE and human mid-coronal dentin had statistically the same radiopacity. All other adhesives tested had significantly lower radiopacity. Radiopacity of the adhesive may reduce the occurrence of doubtful X-ray images, where a radiolucent thicker adhesive layer under a restoration might be misinterpreted as caries, gap or void resulting in unnecessary treatment.
Division: IADR/AADR/CADR General Session
Meeting: 2020 IADR/AADR/CADR General Session (Washington, D.C., USA)
Location: Washington, D.C., USA
Year: 2020
Final Presentation ID: 0757
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Dental Materials 4: Adhesion
Authors
  • Loll, Henry  ( 3M Deutschland GmbH , Seefeld , Bavaria , Germany )
  • Brinkmann, Ole  ( 3M Deutschland GmbH , Seefeld , Bavaria , Germany )
  • Anich, Bernd  ( 3M Deutschland GmbH , Seefeld , Bavaria , Germany )
  • Dede, Karsten  ( 3M Deutschland GmbH , Seefeld , Bavaria , Germany )
  • Craig, Bradley  ( 3M , St. Paul , Minnesota , United States )
  • Abuelyaman, Ahmed  ( 3M , St. Paul , Minnesota , United States )
  • Thalacker, Christoph  ( 3M Deutschland GmbH , Seefeld , Bavaria , Germany )
  • Financial Interest Disclosure: All authors are employees of 3M Deutschland GmbH or 3M Company.
    SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    Universal Adhesives
    TABLES
    MaterialRadiopacity(SD) [% Al]Distinct radiolucent area underneath Class I restoration
    Dentin99.0(6.6)An.a.
    ADH-XTE93.7(3.8)ANo
    SBU21.0(1.0)CYes
    ADU21.0(1.0)CYes
    PBNT20.3(0.6)CYes
    PBA17.3(0.6)CYes
    CSE21.3(0.6)CYes
    OSP36.0(7.2)BYes