Surface Property of Composite with and Without Fluorapatite Crystals
Objectives: Investigate the surface roughness, microhardness and contact angle of three resin composites with and without fluorohydroxyapatite (FA). Methods: Thirty composite disks were prepared from three materials, bisGMA, TMES/DNBPA and TMES/TNTATO with and without FA crystals and finished with 600-grit wet silicon carbide paper. All samples were polished using Sof-Lex™ Spiral Wheels for 15 seconds. Surface roughness measurements were made using a laser-measuring microscope. For the Microhardness test a 200g load was applied for 10s. Three indentations were produced in each sample and averaged to calculate the Vickers hardness (VHN). The static contact angle of a 3 µL droplet of water was measured on a Rame-Hart 200-F1 goniometer with 18.1 MW-cm water. Results were analyzed with and without FA, with 1-way ANOVA/ Tukey’s multiple comparison. Results: There was no significant difference in surface roughness (SA) between bisGMA/TEGDMA + FA (0.20) and the non-FA control (0.19). A significant difference was found for TMES/DNBPA + FA (0. 38) and TMES/DNBPA (0.30) and for TMES/TNTATO+FA (0.29) and TMES/TNTATO (0.21). TMES/DNBPA and TMES/TNTATO with and without FA had significantly higher surface roughness value than biaGMA/ TEGDMA with or without FA. Microhardness showed that incorporation of FA does not cause any significant difference in surface hardness (VHN): bisGMA/TEGDMA + FA (34.2), bisGMA/TEGDMA (35.6), TMES/DNBPA + FA (19.2), TMES/DNBPA (23), TMES/TNTATO+FA (26.6) and TMES/TNTATO (23.6) The Incorporation of the FA reduced the contact angle for the 3 composites, but was only statistically significant for bisGMA/TEGDMA + FA (57.6) and its non-FA control (45.5). All experimental composites had statistically smaller contact angles (range 29-30) than those of bisGMA/ TEGDMA with or without FA, which were 57.6 and 45.5 respectively. Conclusions: Incorporation of FA reduced the contact angle value and increased the surface roughness of experimental resin composites, but did not affect the surface hardness.
Division:IADR/AADR/CADR General Session
Meeting:2020 IADR/AADR/CADR General Session (Washington, D.C., USA) Location:Washington, D.C., USA
Year: 2020 Final Presentation ID:3358 Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s):Dental Materials 2:Polymer-based Materials
Authors
Alhussein, Abdullah
( University of Michigan
, Ann Arbor
, Michigan
, United States
)
Yaman, Peter
( University of Michigan
, Ann Arbor
, Michigan
, United States
)
Dennison, Joseph
( University of Michigan
, Plymouth
, Michigan
, United States
)
Chang, Sywe-ren
( University of Michigan
, Ann Arbor
, Michigan
, United States
)
Clarkson, B. H.
( University of Michigan
, Ann Arbor
, Michigan
, United States
)
Support Funding Agency/Grant Number: NIDR-F045944
Financial Interest Disclosure: None