IADR Abstract Archives

Shear Bond Strength of a Novel Resin Cement to Zirconia

Objectives: Measure shear bond strength(SBS) of a novel resin cement to zirconia in self-cure(sc) and light-cure(lc) modes.
Methods: Two self-adhesive-resin-cements, 1-Experimental Cement(3M) and 2-Calibra Universal(Dentsply); two adhesive-resin-cements, 3-Experimental Cement(3M)+Experimental adhesive(3M) & 4-Panavia V5(Kuraray)+Clearfil Ceramic Primer Plus(Kuraray), were used according to manufacturer’s instructions. A total of 48 zirconia(Lava Esthetic-3M) samples were separated into 8groups(n=6). Samples were sandblasted, rinsed with ethanol and dried with air. Stainless-steel rods measuring 4mm in diameter were sandpapered, sandblasted, silanized and cemented under pressure(20g/mm2). Excess cement was removed immediately, then 1-for self-cure mode, a glycerine gel(Airblock™-Dentsply) was applied around the specimens before storage(10min) under pressure at 36°C; 2-for light-cure mode, a LED-curing unit(Elipar Deep Cure-3M) was used to polymerize(10s) specimens from 4 different angles. After initial treatment, pressure was relieved and specimens were washed off with distilled water. All specimens were stored at 36°C in 100% relative humidity for 24h before testing. SBS was performed in a universal testing machine(Zwick Z010) at crosshead speed of 0.75mm/min. Results were analyzed with ANOVA followed by Tukey HSD test(α=0.05).
Results: Means and standard deviations of SBS are shown in Figures and Tables. Statistically significant differences in SBS values were found. Subgroups are identified with letters in Figures and Tables. Group3 in self-cure mode presented statistically significantly higher (p<0.05) SBS values than all other groups. In light-cure mode although group3 presented higher SBS values, there was no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) to group1.
Conclusions: Under limitations of this study, it can be concluded that in self-cure mode the Experimental Cement+Experimental adhesive presented SBS values statistically significantly higher. In self-cure mode there was no difference between the Experimental Cement in self-adhesive mode, Calibra Universal and Panavia V5+Clearfil Ceramic Primer Plus. In light-cure, the Experimental Cement+Experimental adhesive presented higher SBS values although there was no statistically significantly difference to the Experimental Cement in self-adhesive mode.
Division: IADR/AADR/CADR General Session
Meeting: 2020 IADR/AADR/CADR General Session (Washington, D.C., USA)
Location: Washington, D.C., USA
Year: 2020
Final Presentation ID: 1838
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Dental Materials 2:Polymer-based Materials
Authors
  • Sabrosa, Carlos Eduardo  ( Clínica Odontológica Dr Sabrosa , Rio de Janeiro , Brazil ;  Ghent University , Guent , Belgium ;  Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar Egas Moniz , Caparica , Portugal )
  • Geber, Karen  ( Clínica Odontológica Dr Sabrosa , Rio de Janeiro , Brazil )
  • Vandeweghe, Stefan  ( Ghent University , Guent , Belgium )
  • Financial Interest Disclosure: NONE
    SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    Polymer-based Materials: General Mechanical Properties
    TABLES
    Table 2. Means and standard deviations of SBS values (MPa) in the light-cure (lc) mode.
    groupmaterialmean ± std (MPa)tukey hsd (α=0.05)
    1experimental cement sc39.5 ± 1.8b
    2calibra universal sc39.2 ± 4.4b
    3experimental cement sc + experimental adhesive sc60.4 ± 5.7a
    4panavia v5 sc + ceramic primer sc41.4 ± 5.4b

    Table 2. Means and standard deviations of SBS values (MPa) in the light-cure (lc) mode.
    groupmaterialmean ± sd (MPa)tukey hsd (α=0.05)
    1experimental cement lc54.2 ± 6.2c
    2calibra universal lc40.3 ± 5.0a, b
    3experimental cement lc + experimental adhesive sc62.4 ± 7.3a
    4panavia v5 lc + ceramic primer sc44.7 ± 7.2b, c

    IMAGES