IADR Abstract Archives

Shear Bond Strength Evaluation of Contemporary Dental Cements on Zirconia

Objectives: Purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear strength bonding on monolithic zirconia utilizing six different dental cements.
Methods: Thirty rectangular (8x12x2mm) zirconia specimens per material: BruxZir, Katana, ZirCAD, and Lava were mounted in acrylic and abraded with 50μm alumina particles for 10 seconds, then air dry. Each specimen was prepared with a bonding agent (MonoBond Plus) and subsequent cement (Multilink, BioCem, GCem, SpeedCEM, RelyX, and Panavia) formed into plastic cylinder (n=20/cement/zirconia) and oriented for shear bond testing. Cements were tact-cured for 20 seconds with an Elipar™ DeepCure-S curing light. After the first cure, the plastic cylinder was removed, and the cement was cured again from each direction for 20 seconds. The bonded zirconia specimens were stored in a solution of deionized water at 37°C for 24 hours to allow curing. Specimen boned with GCem was stored in a separate container because of the glass ionomer base of the resin. Shear bond strength testing was performed on an UltraTester™ Bond Strength Testing Machine with a speed of 1.0mm/minute. Maximum stress (MPa) data were compared and statistically analyzed using a two-way repeated measure ANOVA SNK with P<0.05 for significance.
Results: Means and standard deviations test results and statistical info for shear bond strength are located in the table below.
Conclusions: Zirconia bonding with an array of different cements only demonstrated a significant greater difference in shear bond strength for GCem paired with Katana. When using Biocem, a slightly reduced shear bond strength was observed with BruxZir (P=0.02), Katana (P<0.001), and Zircad (P=0.034) using these methods.
Division: IADR/AADR/CADR General Session
Meeting: 2020 IADR/AADR/CADR General Session (Washington, D.C., USA)
Location: Washington, D.C., USA
Year: 2020
Final Presentation ID: 1287
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Dental Materials 1: Ceramic-based Materials
Authors
  • Huynh, Tony  ( University of Tennessee , Memphis , Tennessee , United States )
  • Morrow, Brian  ( University of Tennessee , Memphis , Tennessee , United States )
  • Shafter, Mohamed  ( University Of Tennessee College of Dentistry , Memphis , Tennessee , United States )
  • Financial Interest Disclosure: NONE
    SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    Strength of Ceramic-based Materials
    TABLES
    Monolithic Zirconia Shear Bond Results.
    Cement Materials Zirconia Materials
    BruxZirKatanaZirCADLava
    Multilink29.4(11.0)31.2(11.9)30.8(6.3)25.4(6.8)
    BioCem24.8(11.6) a28.4(6.5) b26.6(6.7) c26.1(6.2)
    GCem32.9(10.7) a41.6(9.4) *33.0(5.9)31.4(8.8)
    SpeedCEM31.3(8.2)35.7(8.7) b34.4(5.8) c33.5(4.9)
    Relyx30.0(7.0)29.1(7.2)31.6(6.7)27.5(7.1)
    Panavia31.8(7.5)35.1(7.9)29.7(8.3)31.0(7.7)
    Same letters indicate a statistically difference between cements within each Zirconia material group. * Denotes differences from all other cements within Zirconia material group.