Shear Bond Strength Evaluation of Contemporary Dental Cements on Zirconia
Objectives: Purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear strength bonding on monolithic zirconia utilizing six different dental cements. Methods: Thirty rectangular (8x12x2mm) zirconia specimens per material: BruxZir, Katana, ZirCAD, and Lava were mounted in acrylic and abraded with 50μm alumina particles for 10 seconds, then air dry. Each specimen was prepared with a bonding agent (MonoBond Plus) and subsequent cement (Multilink, BioCem, GCem, SpeedCEM, RelyX, and Panavia) formed into plastic cylinder (n=20/cement/zirconia) and oriented for shear bond testing. Cements were tact-cured for 20 seconds with an Elipar™ DeepCure-S curing light. After the first cure, the plastic cylinder was removed, and the cement was cured again from each direction for 20 seconds. The bonded zirconia specimens were stored in a solution of deionized water at 37°C for 24 hours to allow curing. Specimen boned with GCem was stored in a separate container because of the glass ionomer base of the resin. Shear bond strength testing was performed on an UltraTester™ Bond Strength Testing Machine with a speed of 1.0mm/minute. Maximum stress (MPa) data were compared and statistically analyzed using a two-way repeated measure ANOVA SNK with P<0.05 for significance. Results: Means and standard deviations test results and statistical info for shear bond strength are located in the table below. Conclusions: Zirconia bonding with an array of different cements only demonstrated a significant greater difference in shear bond strength for GCem paired with Katana. When using Biocem, a slightly reduced shear bond strength was observed with BruxZir (P=0.02), Katana (P<0.001), and Zircad (P=0.034) using these methods.
Division:IADR/AADR/CADR General Session
Meeting:2020 IADR/AADR/CADR General Session (Washington, D.C., USA) Location:Washington, D.C., USA
Year: 2020 Final Presentation ID:1287 Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s):Dental Materials 1: Ceramic-based Materials
Authors
Huynh, Tony
( University of Tennessee
, Memphis
, Tennessee
, United States
)
Morrow, Brian
( University of Tennessee
, Memphis
, Tennessee
, United States
)
Shafter, Mohamed
( University Of Tennessee College of Dentistry
, Memphis
, Tennessee
, United States
)
Financial Interest Disclosure: NONE
SESSION INFORMATION
Poster Session
Strength of Ceramic-based Materials
TABLES
Monolithic Zirconia Shear Bond Results.
Cement Materials
Zirconia Materials
BruxZir
Katana
ZirCAD
Lava
Multilink
29.4(11.0)
31.2(11.9)
30.8(6.3)
25.4(6.8)
BioCem
24.8(11.6) a
28.4(6.5) b
26.6(6.7) c
26.1(6.2)
GCem
32.9(10.7) a
41.6(9.4) *
33.0(5.9)
31.4(8.8)
SpeedCEM
31.3(8.2)
35.7(8.7) b
34.4(5.8) c
33.5(4.9)
Relyx
30.0(7.0)
29.1(7.2)
31.6(6.7)
27.5(7.1)
Panavia
31.8(7.5)
35.1(7.9)
29.7(8.3)
31.0(7.7)
Same letters indicate a statistically difference between cements within each Zirconia material group. * Denotes differences from all other cements within Zirconia material group.