Shear Bond Strength with Flash-Free Brackets and Different Bonding Protocols
Objectives: The Flash-Free Adhesive-coated appliance system was recently introduced to eliminate the need for excess material removal and marginal gaps after bracket placement that may result in white-spots and caries formation. The objectives were to compare different bonding protocols, shear bond strengths and Adhesive Remnant Index between pre-pasted Flash-Free brackets and conventional stainless-steel brackets. Methods: 105 extracted premolars were pumiced, mounted and randomly divided into seven groups (N=15) with different surface conditioning (+/- 37% H3PO4), choice of primers (Transbond-MIP, Assure-Plus or self-etching Transbond-Plus); and protective-sealant (ProSeal) application (+/-). All Flash-Free brackets and metal brackets (control) were bonded under a constant pressure, and excessive adhesives were removed before light curing. All bonded teeth were thermocycled 500 cycles (5o and 55oC) and shear bond strengths (SBS) were determined using an Instron testing machine (1mm/min). Modified Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) 1-5 were scored (no adhesive - all adhesive on bracket) to determine the bond failure mode. Difference in SBS and ARI’s among the groups were statistically analyzed (ANOVA, Tukey’s HSD, p≤0.05)
Results: Significant differences in SBS were found among the groups studied (p<0.0001). Conventional bonding with metal bracket yielded the highest SBS (12.5 MPa) which was significantly higher than all Flash-Free ceramic bracket groups except when total-acid-etching and Assure-Plus primer was used (10.5 MPa). Use of self-etch-primer and protective sealant yielded significantly lower bond strengths (5.4 MPa). ARI of Flash-Free brackets scored significantly higher for self-etch and surface-sealed group (ARI=4.7). The total-etch and primed Flash-Free groups left significantly more resin on tooth surfaces after debonding (p<0.001) with ARI’s ranging 1.6-2.5 compared to that with metal brackets (ARI =3.2) Conclusions: Flash-Free system yields clinically acceptable shear-bond-strengths compared to metal brackets, except when self-etch primer and protective-sealant are used. Frequent failure mode that occurs cohesively or at the resin-bracket interface in the Flash-Free bracket system may require more cleanup after debonding.
Division:IADR/AADR/CADR General Session
Meeting:2020 IADR/AADR/CADR General Session (Washington, D.C., USA) Location:Washington, D.C., USA
Year: 2020 Final Presentation ID:3549 Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s):Orthodontics Research
Authors
Kao, Elizabeth
( West Virginia University
, Morgantown
, West Virginia
, United States
)
Berstein, Carl
( West Virginia University
, Morgantown
, West Virginia
, United States
)
Xiang, Jun
( West Virginia University
, Morganton
, West Virginia
, United States
)
Martin, Chris
( West Virginia University
, Morgantown
, West Virginia
, United States
)
Ngan, Peter
( West Virginia University
, Morgantown
, West Virginia
, United States
)
Financial Interest Disclosure: none
SESSION INFORMATION
Poster Session
Material & Appliances in Orthodontics