Degree of Conversion and Cell Viability of Iodonium salt/MDP-containing Adhesives
Objectives: To characterize through degree of conversion (DC) and cell viability analyses adhesives containing the photoinitiators systems camphorquinone/amine and camphorquinone/amine/DPHIF salt associated with MDP, light activated with a conventional LED device or a broad spectrum one. This study evaluated three factors: photoinitiator system (CQ/amine or CQ/amine/DPHIF), concentration of MDP (0%, 3% or 12%) and curing unit device (conventional LED or broad-spectrum LED). Two response variables were studied: DC and biocompatibility. Methods: Experimental adhesives were prepared containing camphorquinone/amine or camphorquinone/amine/DPHIF as photoinitiators and three different concentrations of MDP (0%, 3% or 12%). The DC was evaluated by FTIR-ATR. The cell viability was evaluated by testing the cell viability through MTT and crystal violet tests. Experimental adhesives were light activated with two devices: a broad-spectrum LED device and a conventional LED one. The data were analyzed by Anova and Tukey's HSD (α = 0.05). Results: Significant differences were found between photoinitiator systems (p = 0.007) and MDP concentration (p <0.001). The light-curing device was not significant (p = 0.33). The double photoinitiator system presented a lower DC in relation to the triple system. The DC increased with the addition of MDP. The only significant interactions occurred between photoinitiator and percentage of MDP (p = 0.0007) and between photoinitiator and light-curing device (p = 0.0015). No cytotoxic effects were observed for all adhesives evaluated. Conclusions: The photoinitiator and the addition of MDP influenced the degree of conversion without affecting the cell viability.
Division:IADR/AADR/CADR General Session
Meeting:2020 IADR/AADR/CADR General Session (Washington, D.C., USA) Location:Washington, D.C., USA
Year: 2020 Final Presentation ID:2945 Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s):Dental Materials 4: Adhesion
Authors
Furuse, Adilson
( Bauru School of Dentistry
, Bauru
, SP
, Brazil
)
Lucena, Fernanda
( Bauru School of Dentistry
, Bauru
, SP
, Brazil
)
Muller, Matheus
( Graduate Program in Dentistry, UP - Universidade Positivo
, Curitiba
, PR
, Brazil
)
Oliveira, Rodrigo
( University of Sao Paulo
, Bauru, SP
, Brazil
)
Mondelli, Rafael
( Bauru School of Dentistry
, Bauru
, SP
, Brazil
)
Gonzaga, Carla
( Graduate Program in Dentistry, UP - Universidade Positivo
, Curitiba
, PR
, Brazil
)
Support Funding Agency/Grant Number: Supported by São Paulo Research Foundation grant 2019/05427-9
Financial Interest Disclosure: NONE
SESSION INFORMATION
Poster Session
Adhesion I: Dentin Biomodification
TABLES
Mean values and standard deviations of the DC data.
Adhesive
MDP%
LED device
DC%
CQ/amine/DPIHF
0%
Valo
61.37 (1.86) a
CQ/amine/DPIHF
0%
Dabi
59.96 (0.90) a
CQ/amine/DPIHF
3%
Valo
89.83 (8.77) cd
CQ/amine/DPIHF
3%
Dabi
83.06 (2.60) bc
CQ/amine/DPIHF
12%
Valo
93.66 (5.88) d
CQ/amine/DPIHF
12%
Dabi
89.70 (2.03) cd
CQ/amine
0%
Valo
62.62 (10.58) a
CQ/amine
0%
Dabi
63.9 (1.25) a
CQ/amine
3%
Valo
76.72 (0.26) b
CQ/amine
3%
Dabi
79.56 (1.61) b
CQ/amine
12%
Valo
84.22 (3.56) bcd
CQ/amine
12%
Dabi
85.41 (1.57) bcd
Similar letters indicate no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05)