IADR Abstract Archives

Acrylate/methacrylate Comonomer Combinations to Control Nanogel Structural Development

Objective: This study examines the relative consumption of acrylate/methacrylate comonomers during polymerizations to yield nanogels from mono-/di-functional combinations of (meth)acrylate monomers with the aim to provide enhanced nanogel structural control.

Method: A mixed acrylate/methacrylate monomer was prepared by reaction of hydroxyethyl acrylate (HEA) with 2-isocyanatoethyl methacrylate (IEM). The desired product (HEAIEM) was confirmed by 1H NMR spectroscopy. Isobornyl methacrylate (IBMA) or isobornyl acrylate (IBA) was copolymerized in toluene with ethoxylated bisphenol-A-dimethacrylate (BisEMA), ethoxylated bisphenol-A-diacrylate (BisEA) or HEAIEM at an 80/20 mole ratio with 5 mol% mercaptoethanol as chain transfer agent.  The thermal polymerizations were initiated with 2,2-azobisisobutyronitrile at 80°C. Aliquots were taken at 15 min intervals for conversion (mid-IR) and compositional (NMR) analysis up to macrogelation.  Intermediate and final nanogel polymer samples were isolated by precipitation from hexane followed by characterization of molecular weight/hydrodynamic radius by triple-detection size exclusion chromatography.

Result:

The methacrylate group in HEAIEM is consumed faster than the other bonds in IBMA/HEAIEM and IBA/HEAIEM. These reach similar overall conversions but IBA/HEAIEM reaches its maximum conversion in less time with full conversion of IBA and the methacrylate of HEAIEM.  IBMA/BisEMA has higher conversion and size than IBA/BisEMA. The diacrylate is preferentially consumed in IBMA/BisEA and IBA/BisEA.

 Material

Overall conversion/time

Mw (Da)

Rh (nm)

Relative Consumption (%)

IBMA/BisEMA

84.2% 105 min

550,000

11.5

62.5:39.1

IBMA/BisEA

65.7% 135 min

54,100

4.2

12.9:20.8

IBMA/HEAIEM

77.5% 120min

69,400

4.1

22.3:31.5:62.8

IBA/BisEMA

55.0% 45 min

48,200

4.4

45:47

IBA/BisEA

72.7% 60 min

284,500

7.3

11.5:16.8

IBA/HEAIEM

74.5% 75 min

239,500

5.5

100:51.5:100

Conclusion: Reactions using IBMA were significantly slower than with IBA. With the exception of IBA/BisEMA, the reactions are similar in conversion and molecular weight is larger with IBA. This work demonstrates an ability to impose control over nanogel branching density at various stages of the reaction process.

AADR/CADR Annual Meeting
2012 AADR Annual Meeting (Tampa, Florida)
Tampa, Florida
2012
826
Dental Materials 6: Polymer-based Materials-Chemistry and Composition
  • Barros, Matthew  ( University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA )
  • Stansbury, Jeffrey  ( University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA )
  • Poster Session
    Polymer-based Materials - Chemistry and Composition
    03/23/2012