IADR Abstract Archives

Characteristics of Enamel Lesion Restorations Placed by Dental PBRN Dentists

Objective: To test the hypothesis that dentist/practice and patient characteristics are associated with restorative treatment of carious enamel lesions. 

Method: DPBRN dentists enrolled 50 consecutive restorations placed on previously unrestored adult tooth surfaces, up to four per patient. The DPBRN comprises dental practices mainly from five regions: Alabama/Mississippi, Florida/Georgia, Minnesota, Permanente Dental Associates, and Scandinavia. Patient and restoration characteristics were collected during the visit. Dentist/practice information was obtained from previous surveys. Preoperative depths were diagnosed with methods routinely used in each practice for previously unrestored occlusal and/or proximal surfaces. Analysis of variance and logistic regression were done using generalized estimating equations to assess dentist/practice and patient predictors of enamel lesion restorations, accounting for clustering within practitioner and patient.

Results: 229 practitioner-investigators placed 5,532 restorations involving an occlusal surface and 4,166 involving a proximal surface in 4,397 patients; 1,447 included both occlusal and proximal surfaces (95% of eligible restorations were enrolled). About 13% of occlusal and 6% of proximal caries lesions were confined to the enamel based on preoperative assessment (p<.0001). DPBRN region, patient age, and patient sex (proximal only) were significantly associated with the percentage of enrolled enamel lesions (p-values <0.05). The percentage of enrolled lesions limited to enamel varied by DPBRN region from 20% to 3% for occlusal lesions, and 12% to 1% for proximal lesions. Dentists in the southeast US regions had the highest percentage of enamel lesions restored. Other patient and dentist/practice characteristics were not related to enamel lesion enrollment.

Conclusion: The significant differences in the percentage of enrolled enamel lesions between DPBRN regions, and lack of association with indicators of patient caries risk and other dentist/practice characteristics, suggest that the external environment (e.g., patient preferences, reimbursement model) has a substantial influence on dentists’ treatment decisions. Support: U01-DE-16746, U01-DE-16747.

Division: AADR/CADR Annual Meeting
Meeting: 2012 AADR Annual Meeting (Tampa, Florida)
Location: Tampa, Florida
Year: 2012
Final Presentation ID: 6
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Cariology Research - Clinical and Epidemiological Studies
Authors
  • Fellows, Jeffrey L.  ( Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA )
  • Pihlstrom, Daniel  ( Permanente Dental Associates, Portland, OR, USA )
  • Johnson, Neil  ( University of Minnesota, Robbinsdale, MN, USA )
  • Dpbrn Collaborative Group, The  ( University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA )
  • Gordan, Valeria  ( University of Florida, Newberry, FL, USA )
  • Gilbert, Gregg  ( University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA )
  • Rindal, D. Brad  ( HealthPartners, Minneapolis, MN, USA )
  • Qvist, Vibeke  ( University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen N, N/A, Denmark )
  • Litaker, Mark S.  ( University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA )
  • Benjamin, Paul L.  ( Private Practice, Miami, FL, USA )
  • Flink, Håkan  ( Uppsala University, Västerås, N/A, Sweden )
  • Falck, Anne  ( Private Practice, Lysekil, N/A, Sweden )
  • SESSION INFORMATION
    Oral Session
    Cariology: Clinical Studies
    03/21/2012