Method: Eighty-four implants were divided in four groups (n=21): REG-EH and SWT-EH (regular and switched-platform implants with external connection, respectively); REG-IH and SWT-IH (regular and switched-platform implants with internal connection, respectively). Use-level probability Weibull curves and reliability were calculated. Four finite element models reproducing the characteristics of specimens used in laboratory testing were created to evaluate the stress distribution (σvM) within the implant-abutment complex.
Result: The Beta values for groups SWT-EH (1.31), REG-EH (1.55), SWT-IH (1.83) and REG-IH (1.82) indicated that fatigue accelerated the failure of all groups. The higher levels of σvM within the implant-abutment connection observed for platform-switched implants (groups SWT-EH and SWT-IH) were in agreement with the lower reliability observed for the external hex implants, but not for the internal hex implants. The reliability 90% confidence intervals (50,000 cycles at 300N) were 0.53(0.33-0.70), 0.93(0.80-0.97), 0.99(0.93-0.99) and 0.99(0.99-1.00), for the SWT-EH, REG-EH, SWT-IH, and REH-IH, respectively. Failure modes were similar in all groups.
Conclusion: The postulated hypothesis was partially accepted. The higher levels of stress observed within implant-abutment connection when reducing abutment diameter resulted in lower reliability for external hex implants, but not for internal hex implants.