IADR Abstract Archives

PEARL Non-carious Cervical Lesion RCT Baseline and Sleep Bruxism Findings

Objective: Determine the comparative efficacy of 3 treatments for hypersensitive noncarious cervical lesions using a Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) design with three arms: chemoactive dentifrice (CD), dentin bonding agent with sealant (DBAS) or flowable resin–based composite (RBC) restoration. Sleep bruxism as cofactor in NCL presentation was investigated.

Methods: Sixteen PEARL Network Practitioner-Investigators (P-Is) enrolled 225 subjects with NCL lesions (88% premolars, remainder molars) with calibrated air flow Numeric Pain Assessment Scale (0-10) readings ≥3. Subjects were evaluated via criteria (4) for sleep bruxism (American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2001) and filled out sensitivity and OHIP-14 questionnaires. Following cervical impression lesions were randomized to one of the three treatments and so treated, DBAS and RBC groups were then again air flow tested. Patients were recalled at 1, 3 and 6 months post treatment and impression (3 and 6 m) and all measures repeated.

Results: Subjects were predominately (66%, 148/225) female and overall mean age 46.6 (±10.0) yrs. At baseline patients reported sensitivity scores; cold > sweet > hot >chewing = clenching. Sleep bruxism was found in 43.4%, (95/225) of subjects with 55% of those from 40-47 yrs old. Of those with bruxism >20% exhibit 3 or more signs/symptoms. Recall rate at 6 m (132 evaluated) was 97%. The median (range) pre-treatment hypersensitivity was 5 (3-10), 1 m post-treatment 1 (0-8), 3 m 1 (0-9) and 6 m 0 (0-8). Mean pre-treatment hypersensitivity was 5.4 ± 1.8 and baseline post-treatment significantly (p<0.05) less 1.4 ± 1.7 for the combined DBAS and RBC subjects.

Conclusions: PEARL P-I successfully enrolled subjects and randomized patients with a high 6 month recall percentage. Dentin bonding agent followed by sealant and resin based composite restoration significantly lowered baseline air sensitivity. Sleep bruxism appears to be a cofactor in non-carious cervical lesion patients. Supported by NIDCR U01-DE016755.


IADR/AADR/CADR General Session
2011 IADR/AADR/CADR General Session (San Diego, California)
San Diego, California
2011
149
Dental Materials 4: Clinical Trials
  • Jetter, Cynthia  ( The PEARL Network, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY, USA )
  • Abboud-niemczyk, J.  ( The PEARL Network, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY, USA )
  • Craig, R.g.  ( The PEARL Network, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY, USA )
  • Curro, F.a.  ( The PEARL Network, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY, USA )
  • Thompson, V.p  ( The PEARL Network, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY, USA )
  • Wu, J.  ( EMMES Corporation, Rockville, MD, USA )
  • Matthews, A.g.  ( EMMES Corporation, Rockville, MD, USA )
  • Vena, Don  ( EMMES Corporation, Rockville, MD, USA )
  • Oral Session
    Clinical Studies: Direct Restorative Materials
    03/16/2011