IADR Abstract Archives

Effect of surface treatments at titanium/luting-cements bond strength

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of surface treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) of resin-modified glass ionomer and resin cements to commercially pure titanium (CP Ti). Methods: CP Ti discs were divided into 8 surface treatments groups (n=30): (1) 50µm Al2O3 particles; (2) 120µm Al2O3 particles; (3) 250µm Al2O3 particles; (4) 50µm Al2O3 particles + silane (RelyX Ceramic Primer); (5) 120µm Al2O3 particles + silane; (6) 250µm Al2O3 particles + silane; (7) 30µm silica-modified Al2O3 particles (Cojet Sand) + silane; (8) 110µm silica-modified Al2O3 particles (Rocatec) + silane. The luting cements (1) RelyX Luting 2; (2) RelyX ARC; (3) RelyX U100 were applied to CP Ti treated surfaces (n=10). After thermal cycling SBS test was carried out. Data were analyzed using 2-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=.05). Results: The results revealed that surface treatment, cement and their interaction were significant (P<.001). RelyX U100 exhibited the highest SBS values, independently of surface treatments used. Selection of the best surface treatment varied according to the cement. For the RelyX Luting 2 the best surface treatments was 50µm Al2O3 particles+silane, 120µm Al2O3 particles+silane and Rocatec+silane and for the RelyX ARC was Rocatec+silane. The use of 120µm Al2O3 particles provided the highest SBS for the RelyX U100.

Table 1. Mean SBS values (MPa), standard deviations and statistical results

RelyX Luting 2

RelyX ARC

RelyX U100

Al2O3 50µm

6.31(1.30)Be

4.10(0.79)Cd

12.39(2.16)Af

Al2O3 120µm

7.12(0.94)Bd

5.42(0.78)Cc

16.71(2.90)Aa

Al2O3 250µm

6.94(1.45)Bde

5.74(1.11)Cc

13.76(2.03)Ae

Al2O3 50µm+silane

8.30(0.96)Bab

4.34(0.71)Cd

15.80(3.25)Ab

Al2O3 120µm+silane

8.58 (0.74)Ba

5.51(0.96)Cc

15.35(1.75)Ac

Al2O3 250µm+silane

7.94(0.87)Bbc

6.64(1.36)Cb

14.89(1.87)Ad

Cojet Sand+silane

7.61(1.13)Bc

5.70(0.93)Cc

14.89(2.80)Ad

Rocatec+silane

8.52(0.47)Ca

11.84(1.75)Ba

15.38(3.00)Abc

Different uppercase letters indicate significant differences in row (P<0.05)

Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences in columns (P<0.05)

Conclusion: CP Ti surface treatment may increase metal/cement bond strength but the treatments had different effect on the studied cements.


Division: IADR/AADR/CADR General Session
Meeting: 2011 IADR/AADR/CADR General Session (San Diego, California)
Location: San Diego, California
Year: 2011
Final Presentation ID: 526
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Dental Materials 1: Adhesion - Bond Strength Testing and Mechanisms
Authors
  • Abi-rached, Filipe O.  ( Araraquara Dental School, UNESP - Univ. Estadual Paulista, Araraquara - São Paulo, N/A, Brazil )
  • Fonseca, Renata Garcia  ( Araraquara Dental School, UNESP - Univ. Estadual Paulista, Araraquara - São Paulo, N/A, Brazil )
  • Almeida-júnior, Antonio Alves  ( Araraquara Dental School, UNESP - Univ. Estadual Paulista, Araraquara - São Paulo, N/A, Brazil )
  • Haneda, Isabella Gagliardi  ( Araraquara Dental School, UNESP - Univ. Estadual Paulista, Araraquara - São Paulo, N/A, Brazil )
  • Adabo, Gelson Luis  ( Araraquara Dental School, UNESP - Univ. Estadual Paulista, Araraquara - São Paulo, N/A, Brazil )
  • Cruz, Carlos Alberto Santos  ( Araraquara Dental School, UNESP - Univ. Estadual Paulista, Araraquara - São Paulo, N/A, Brazil )
  • SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    Adhesion to Other Materials
    03/17/2011