Cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of bacterial cellulose-collagen membranes
Bacterial cellulose formed by fermentation from Acetobacter xylinum promotes bone neoformation being a promising material for guided tissue regeneration, particularly when incorporate bioactive materials. Type I collagen matrix offers a suitable environment for induction of osteogenesis. Collagen membranes have been used to regenerate periodontal tissues. For a safe use in humans, all materials should not present cytotoxic and genotoxic effects. Objectives: to evaluate the potencial cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of bacterial cellulose (BC) and type I collagen-BC (COL-BC) membranes. Methods: BC was modified by glicine esterification through solid phase methodology (Fmoc strategy), followed by cross-linking of type I collagen employing 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide. CHO-K1 cells were seeded in a 24-well platform containing discs of BC or COL-BC membranes and positive (doxorubicin) and negative controls (NC), for 24h. Cytotoxicity was assessed by XTT (CHO-K1, 2x104) and clonogenic survival (CS) (CHO-K1, 5x104) assays. Genotoxic effect of BC and COL-BC membranes was evaluated by comet assay and cytokinesis block micronucleus (CBMN) test (CHO-K1, 5x104). Results: XTT and CS assays showed no cytotoxicity of BC and COL-BC membranes when compared to the negative control (Tukey, p>0.05). Slight higher rate of cell proliferation (101.9%) was observed in COL-BC membranes compared to BC and NC. No significant DNA damage (comet assay) was observed in BC and COL-BC membranes (p>0.05). Interestingly, the COL-BC presented a slight lower DNA Damage Index in comparison with NC. The nuclear division index (NDI) measured by CBMN assay did not demonstrate significant differences between the membranes and NC (ANOVA, p=0.96). For BC and COL-BC, the NDI were, respectively, 12.0±1.2 and 14.3±0.7. In contrast, positive control presented a statistically higher NDI score (350.3, p<0.01). Conclusion: BC and COL-BC membranes did not present cytotoxic and genotoxic effects in vitro , indicating that these materials are safe for application in guided tissue regeneration.
Division: IADR/AADR/CADR General Session
Meeting:2011 IADR/AADR/CADR General Session (San Diego, California) Location: San Diego, California
Year: 2011 Final Presentation ID:1471 Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s):Pharmacology, Therapeutics, & Toxicology
Authors
Capote, Ticiana Sidorenko Oliveira
( UNESP - São Paulo State University, Araraquara, N/A, Brazil
)
Takahashi, Catarina Satie
( São Paulo University, Ribeirão Preto, N/A, Brazil
)
Scarel-caminaga, Raquel Mantuaneli
( UNESP - São Paulo State University, Araraquara, N/A, Brazil
)
Saska, Sybele
( UNESP - São Paulo State University, Araraquara, N/A, Brazil
)
Franchi, Leonardo Pereira
( São Paulo University, Ribeirão Preto, N/A, Brazil
)
Gaspar, Ana Maria Minarelli
( UNESP - São Paulo State University, Araraquara, N/A, Brazil
)
Ribeiro, Sidney José Lima
( UNESP - São Paulo State University, Araraquara, N/A, Brazil
)
Messaddeq, Younes
( UNESP - São Paulo State University, Araraquara, N/A, Brazil
)
Marchetto, Reinaldo
( UNESP - São Paulo State University, Araraquara, N/A, Brazil
)
Santos, Raquel Alves
( São Paulo University, Ribeirão Preto, N/A, Brazil
)
SESSION INFORMATION
Poster Session
Pharmacology, Therapeutics, & Toxicology I
03/17/2011