IADR Abstract Archives

Conversion and Shear Bond Strength of Experimental Self-Etching Adhesive

 

Objective: This study evaluates the relationship between the Degree of Conversion (DC) and Shear Bond Strength (SBS) of one experimental (EXP) two step self-etching bonding agent compare to three equivalent commercial products, Methods: The experimental formulation consisted of a Part-A and a Part-B system. Part-A was formulated using a newly developed dimer acid based phosphonate monomer, bisphenol-A-glycidyl dimethacrylate (Bis-GMA) and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) dissolved in ethanol. Part-B contained ethoxylate-bis-phenolA(Bis-EMA), dimer-dicarbamate-dimethacrylate (DDCDMA) and urethane-dimethacrylate (UDMA). Both parts were light activated with camphorquinone/ethyl-4-dimethylaminobenzoate. Three different commercial products were tested: Clearfill SE(Kuraray), AdheSE(Oratech) and Pro-Options(Ivoclar). DC (n=3) was assessed by near infrared spectroscopy in the adhesive(air dried) and bonding parts separately, as well as the combination adhesive/bonding(air dried). For the experimental formulation, DC was measured in the Part A and in the 1:1wt% mixture of Part-A and Part-B after air dry for 20s and in the Part-B without any previous treatment. Ultradent SBS tests were performed on dry dentin of human third molars after 24h water storage at 37oC. N'Durance Universal Composite, from Septodont, was used with all adhesives in order to assure consistency in results. . All samples were prepared following the manufacturer's instructions. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls test (p<0.001), Results: Results are shown in the table below. For each column, similar letters indicate that no significant differences were found.

 

Product

Part A

Conversion (%)

Part B Conversion (%)

Part A+B Conversion (%)

SBS (MPa)

Dentin

EXP

82.1±0.9[A]

80.6±0.5[A]

80.1+1.4[A]

19.2±5.4[A]

Clearfil SE

99.6±0.3[B]

90.2± 0.6[B]

96.1±0.5[B]

23.5±2.3[A]

Adhesive SE

Did not polymerize

77.2±0.5[C]

71.3±0.9[C]

18.7±2.5[A]

Pro-options

15.0±2.6[C]

96.8±0.1[D]

96.2±0.3[B]

29.3±5.0[B]

Conclusion: Within the limitations of the current experiment, the results show that the DC as well as SBS differ significantly. A linear correlation was found between conversion and SBS.


Division: IADR/AADR/CADR General Session
Meeting: 2011 IADR/AADR/CADR General Session (San Diego, California)
Location: San Diego, California
Year: 2011
Final Presentation ID: 3168
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Dental Materials 1: Adhesion - Bond Strength Testing and Mechanisms
Authors
  • Ahmed, Isra  ( Septodont, Louisville, CO, USA )
  • Esquibel, Kristina  ( Septodont, Louisville, CO, USA )
  • Ida, Kathryn  ( Septodont, Louisville, CO, USA )
  • Bonner, Carol  ( Septodont, Louisville, CO, USA )
  • Reed, Steven  ( Septodont, Louisville, CO, USA )
  • Sotiros, Alexandra  ( Septodont, Louisville, CO, USA )
  • Ramirez, Jacob  ( Septodont, Louisville, CO, USA )
  • Bracho-troconis, Cora  ( Septodont, Louisville, CO, USA )
  • Trujillo-lemon, Marianela  ( Septodont, Louisville, CO, USA )
  • SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    Adhesion to Dental Tissues V
    03/19/2011