Objectives: Lava DVS (3M ESPE) is the first commercially available CAD CAM veneering for zirconia restorations. The aim was to evaluate the initial strength of Lava DVS posterior crowns, compared to conventionally manufactured all-ceramic crowns.
Methods: Five different all-ceramic restorations were tested: an anatomical designed Lava zirconia coping veneered with Lava DVS (DVS), an anatomical designed Lava coping veneered with IPS e.max® ZirPress (Ivoclar) (ZP-A), a non anatomical designed Lava coping (uniform thickness of 0.5mm) veneered with IPS e.max® ZirPress (ZP-NA) and a monolithic IPS e.max® CAD (Ivoclar) crown (CA-1.2). All these crowns were designed with a minimum occlusion thickness of 1.2mm and an identical outer shape. IPS e.max® CAD crowns were also fabricated with a minimum occlusion thickness of 1.5mm to maintain the manufacturer instructions (CA-1.5). For each group 10 samples were fabricated according the manufacturers instructions. All crowns were cemented with Ketac Cem (3M ESPE) and loaded in a universal testing machine (Instron 5566) with a 10mm steel ball with a traverse speed of 0.5mm/min. The measurements were stopped if a decrease of force or a cracking noise occurred. The maximum fracture force was measured.
Results: Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Fisher's least significant difference (LSD) test at a significance level of 5%. DVS (F = 3715 ± 623N) shows a high initial fracture force. There is no statistical difference between DVS and ZP-A: (F = 3368 ± 676N). To all other groups DVS shows a statistical higher fracture force (ZP-NA: F = 2808 ± 690N; CA-1.2: F = 1373 ± 250N and CA-1.5: F = 3147 ± 364N).
Conclusion: The results show that Lava DVS is expected to have a better mechanical performance compared to non anatomical designed zirconia restorations or lower strength framework crowns with the same crown thickness.