Marginal tearing of an elastomer reduces the accuracy of the impression. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the tear strength of commonly used elastomeric impression materials. Methods: Seven materials were tested, Affinis Precious Light Body (Coltene/Whaledent), Aquasil Ultra XLV Fast Set (Caulk), Exafast NDS Injection Fast Set, Exa'lence Extra Light Body Fast Set (GC), Imprint 3 Quick Step Light Body, Impregum Soft Quick Step Light Body (3M ESPE), and Take 1 Advanced LB Wash Super Fast Set (Kerr). For each material, five axial notch specimens, measuring 4 x 0.75 x 0.0090, were made in a proprietary stainless steel injection mold. The mold was filled with impression material, sealed, and immediately placed in a water bath at 35°C. At the recommended mouth removal time, the specimens were demolded. The specimens were gripped providing 2 of gage length and then continuously loaded in tension in an Instron testing machine at a crosshead speed of 10/min until failure. Tear stress data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and the Tukey-Kramer HSD tests (p ≤ 0.001). Results: Tear stress values are given in the following table. Letters (a-e) denote significant statistical differences between the materials.
Impression Material | Tear Strength (Psi) |
Affinis Precious Light | 617.90 ± 17.89 a |
Aquasil Ultra XLV Fast Set | 603.16 ± 56.85 a |
Imprint 3 Quick Step Light | 577.31 ± 39.45 a |
Exa'lence Extra Light Body Fast Set | 478.78 ± 16.70 b |
Take 1 Advanced LB Super Fast | 345.85 ± 43.75 c |
Exafast NDS Injection Fast Set | 240.52 ± 21.28 d |
Impregum Soft Quick Step Light | 183.73 ± 16.19 e |
Conclusions: Highest tear strengths were found for Affinis Precious Light, Aquasil Ultra XLV Fast Set and Imprint 3 Quick Step Light. Clinical Relevance: Resistance to marginal tearing may be affected by tear strength of elastomeric impression materials. This research was supported in part by Reality Publishing Company.