IADR Abstract Archives

Bonding Between Primed Zirconia and Composite Using Self-adhesive Resin Cement

Objectives: This study assessed the influence of alumina-blasting (AB) and adhesive primer (AP) on the shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement between zirconia and dual-cured resin composite for core build-up. Methods: The specimens were divided into 18 groups with three dual-cured self-adhesive resin cements {Maxcem Elite (ME, Kerr), RelyX Unicem Clicker (RUC, 3M ESPE) G-Luting (GL, GC)}, three different surface treatments {non-treatment (NT), AB, and AB+AP (Metal Primer II (GC)}, and two thermal cyclings (TC). The dual-cured resin composite (Unifil Core EM, GC) disk specimens were also prepared using laboratory-curing unit. The zirconia (GC) specimens were treated with one of three methods, bonded to resin composite with one of three resin cements, and then photo-polymerized with a visible-light-curing unit. Specimens were stored in water at 37ºC for 24 hrs and/or thermocycled 20,000 times before shear bond strength testing. Means and SDs (in parenthesis) of shear bond strength (MPa) are listed in Table. Data were analyzed by three-way ANOVA and identical letters were not significantly different by Tukey Compromise test (p>0.05, n=7). Results: At TC 0, AB and AB+AP were significantly effective for improving shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement between zirconia and resin composite compared with NT. All groups except treatment with AB+AP and bonding with GL, decreased significantly shear bond strength after TC 20,000. Conclusion: These results suggest that the treatment of alumina-blasting followed by application of adhesive primer on the zirconia surface is preferable to obtain durable bonding of dual-cured self-adhesive resin cement between zirconia and resin composite.

Self-adhesive

Surface

Thermal Cycling (TC)

Resin Cement

Treatment

0

20,000

ME

NT

10.0 (0.7)d,e,f

3.7 (1.7)a,b

ME

AB

17.3 (3.1)h,i

5.3 (1.9)a,b,c

ME

AB+AP

17.0 (2.0)h,i

6.2 (1.5)b,c,d

RUC

NT

11.2 (1.9)e,f,g

2.5 (0.9)a,b

RUC

AB

15.0 (2.9)g,h

8.9 (1.6)c,d,e

RUC

AB+AP

18.6 (2.8) h,i

11.9 (2.3) e,f,g

GL

NT

10.5 (1.6)d,e,f,g

1.1 (0.4)a

GL

AB

20.0 (3.8)i

13.9 (1.0)f,g,h

GL

AB+AP

21.7 (3.5)i

18.1 (3.6)h,i


Division: AADR/CADR Annual Meeting
Meeting: 2010 AADR/CADR Annual Meeting (Washington, D.C.)
Location: Washington, D.C.
Year: 2010
Final Presentation ID: 229
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Dental Materials 3: Ceramic-based Materials and Cements
Authors
  • Yoshida, Keiichi  ( Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, N/A, Japan )
  • Kamada, Kohji  ( Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, N/A, Japan )
  • Sawase, Takashi  ( Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, N/A, Japan )
  • SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    Ceramics — Strength, Fatigue, and Wear; Cements — Bonding to Ceramics, Hard Tissues, Media Interactions, and Provisional Materials
    03/04/2010