IADR Abstract Archives

Light Curing Units in Swiss Dental Practices–a Field Analysis

Objectives: To evaluate the distribution of different light curing units (LCUs) in swiss dental practices and to investigate the properties of the different curing units.

Methods: Ten percent of LCUs in dental practices of different regions in Switzerland were randomly evaluated (220 LCUs). With a questionnary the service age, the mode of constancy-test and the dentist's satisfaction was evaluated. All LCUs were standardised tested for light intensity (Ulbricht sphere), spectral emission, light scattering, heat generation and defects. Differences were evaluated with descriptive statistics.

Results:

Table: Variations of different parameters of LCUs (only LCUs mentioned, where n>10)

Light intensity  (mW/cm2)

Spectral emission peak (nm)

Light scattering at tip end (°)

Minimum

Maximum

from

to

Minimum

Maximum

Astralis10

656.5

1655

378.29

535.81

49.6

88.9

Bluephase

537.5

1316.5

392.57

536.16

44.19

83.96

EliparFreelight2

230.5

1064.5

415.82

529.8

62.77

75.25

LEDemetron

397

1282

415.11

531

50.63

76.47

Smartlight

827.5

1653

417

536

87.15

123.49

LED LCUs were widely distributed (>65%) except one region where the distribution was in favor of halogen LCUs. The service age was between 0-5 years (39 LCUs 6-10 years, 11 LCUs 11-15 years). There was a low frequency of constancy tests (15 out of 124 practices) and overall satisfaction of dentists was good. The variability in LCUs properties was very large (Table). The light intensity of 6.4% LCUs was <400mW/cm2 (33.7%<800mW/cm2). Heat generation was correlated to light intensity (Pearson-correlation coefficient = 0.68). Forty-two LCUs were contaminated with bonding remnants or other substances, 67 had damages and 33 LCUs were damaged and contaminated.

Conclusion: Even manufacturers set quality standards of LCUs, there is a large variability in properties when LCUs are used in daily practice. The total amount of insufficient and damaged LCUs seemes too high. Constancy tests and proper handling have to be improved in daily practices.

144 on 1-27-2010-->


Division: IADR/PER General Session
Meeting: 2010 IADR/PER General Session (Barcelona, Spain)
Location: Barcelona, Spain
Year: 2010
Final Presentation ID: 4071
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Dental Materials 10: Instruments and Equipment
Authors
  • Sadiku, Diana  ( University of Bern, Bern, N/A, Switzerland )
  • Schmidli, Desiree  ( University of Bern, Bern, N/A, Switzerland )
  • Lussi, Adrian  ( University of Bern, Bern, N/A, Switzerland )
  • Zimmerli, Brigitte  ( University of Bern, Bern, N/A, Switzerland )
  • SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    Curing Equipment
    07/17/2010