IADR Abstract Archives

Radiopacity Calculation Method and Calculation on Adper Scotchbond SE Adhesive

Objective:  This study developed and tested a simple method to calculate the radiopacity (Rp) of composite and adhesive materials.  The method's ability to accurately calculate Rp was tested by comparing calculated versus experimental values for two systems.  One system was a simple methacrylate-based composite made using tantalum metal as a filler, and the other was the first radiopaque, nano-filled adhesive, Adper Scotchbond SE (3M ESPE).

Method:  The calculation requires as input the elemental composition, the mass absorption coefficient of each element present, and the material density of the composite's constituent parts.  The output of the calculation is the radiopacity in millimeters aluminum equivalent thickness.  Experimental Rp values were determined by ISO 4049:2000(E) part 7.14 on disks of tantalum-filled composite or on disks of neutralized adhesive and primer.

Results:  The number of experimental samples, experimental and calculated Rp values, p-values from the one-sample t-test, and percentage errors (difference between calculated and experimental divided by experimental) are listed in the table below.

Sample

N

Expt. Rp

(mm Al)

Calc. Rp

(mm Al)

p-value

% error

10 wt% Ta composite

3

0.94±0.06

0.99

0.349

5.3

20 wt% Ta composite

3

2.12±0.04

2.03

0.044

4.2

30 wt% Ta composite

3

3.48±0.09

3.31

0.075

4.9

40 wt% Ta composite

3

4.40±0.1

4.91

0.014

11.6

Adper Scotchbond SE

3

1.03±0.16

1.28

0.073

24

Conclusion:  Despite the fact that two calculated Rp values are statistically different (p<0.05) from their corresponding experimentally measured ones, we can state that the method fairly accurately calculates Rp over a wide range of experimental Rp values for the tantalum-filled composite test system.  For the more complicated system of zirconia nanoparticle-filled Adper Scotchbond SE, the calculation is not statistically different from the experimental value, despite the larger percentage error.


Division: IADR/AADR/CADR General Session
Meeting: 2009 IADR/AADR/CADR General Session (Miami, Florida)
Location: Miami, Florida
Year: 2009
Final Presentation ID: 3266
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Dental Materials 6: Polymer-based Materials-Chemistry and Composition
Authors
  • Dunbar, Tim D.  ( 3M ESPE Dental Products, St. Paul, MN, USA )
  • Shukla, Brian A.  ( 3M ESPE Dental Products, Saint Paul, MN, USA )
  • Russell, Victoria A.  ( 3M ESPE Dental Products, St. Paul, MN, USA )
  • Aasen, Steven M.  ( 3M ESPE Dental Products, Saint Paul, MN, USA )
  • SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    Dental Polymers Poster III
    04/04/2009