Objectives: Characterize the remineralization behavior of enamel lesions after a toothbrushing regimen, where the lesion is treated with either a rosin-based varnish applied as a coating over the lesion or an experimental resin-modified glass ionomer material applied adjacent to the lesion.
Methods:
Extracted human molars with artificial caries-like lesions were sectioned longitudinally into 100µm sections; then photographed via PLM with imbibing media of water (nD=1.33; showing >5% porosity), followed by an imbibing media of Thoulet's 1.41 solution (nD=1.41; showing >10% porosity). Acid-resistant varnish was applied to all surfaces, leaving only the external tooth surface with lesion exposed. Three treatments were applied: untreated control group (UNTR); lesion coated with Colgate Duraphat Fluoride Varnish (DUR); experimental resin-modified glass ionomer material EXM-713 placed adjacent to the lesion (EXM-ADJ). The sections were brushed with water daily for thirty days. The acid resistant varnish was removed; sections imaged via PLM again. The lesion body area was quantified with a computerized imaging system. The percent remineralization was calculated from the lesion area before and after. The data were analyzed via one-way ANOVA and compared with Fisher's T-test (p<0.05).
Results: Percent remineralization (stdev). Within each imbibition set, superscript letters denote groups that are not statistically different.
Water Imbibition | n | Mean (StDev) |
UNTR | 9 | 10.08 (7.14)a |
DUR | 10 | 2.39 (2.82)b |
EXM-ADJ | 9 | 3.78 (3.62)b |
Thoulet's Imbibition | n | Mean (StDev) |
UNTR | 10 | 1.51 (4.79)b |
DUR | 10 | 2.90 (2.71)ab |
EXM-ADJ | 9 | 7.17 (7.70)a |
Conclusions:
A resin-modified glass ionomer coating applied adjacent to an enamel lesion resulted in enhanced remineralization compared to an untreated control; a conventional rosin-based fluoride varnish applied over the lesion was not statistically different from the control.
This research was supported, in part, by 3M ESPE.