Objective: To compare creep (μm) and creep moduli rates (stress/strain/sec) of neat resin beams versus resin-infiltrated beams of demineralized dentin (i.e. macrohybrid layers) under dry conditions vs. 2-wk water sorption. Methods: Creep was measured by 3-point flexure using the LVDT of a TMA instrument. Specimen beams 7x1x0.3 mm were created from experimental neat methacrylate blends 1, 2 or 3 or from coronal dentin that was completely demineralized prior to being saturated with ethanol and infiltrated in 2 hr increments in 50% resin/50% ethanol followed by 100% resin, then light-cured. Deformation was measured at 1% strain while specimens were dry, then repeated after immersion in water for 2 wks at 37°C. Results: Neat resins had similar dry creep values, with resins 2 and 3 having significantly higher values while wet. There were no significant differences in the creep values of dry or wet macrohybrid layers (MHL). The creep rates of neat resins 1 and 2 were similar wet or dry, but were significantly lower in wet resin 3. All MHL had significantly lower creep rates while wet.
Neat Resins | Macrohybrid Layers | ||||||
1 (BisGMA/ TEGDMA) | 2 (BisGMA/HEMA) | 3 (BisGMA/ HEMA/2MP) | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
Dry | Creep (μm) | 4.6±2.0a,b | 3.6±1.0b | 5.5±1.1a,b | 6.5±3.2 | 8.0±2.1 | 9.0±6.1 |
Wet | Creep (μm) | 5.2±1.5a | 6.1±2.2a | 8.7±1.7c | 9.7±3.9 | 10.7±0.8 | 12.5±4.8 |
Dry | Creep rate (GPa/s) | 5.0±0.3A | 5.2±0.5A | 5.3±0.9A | 5.5±0.3* | 6.6±0.8** | 7.3±0.4*** |
Wet | Creep rate (GPa/s) | 5.6±0.5A | 5.0±0.5A | 2.7±0.3B | 2.2±0.2**** | 2.1±0.2**** | 1.75±0.3**** |
Different superscript symbols indicate p<0.05. Conclusion: Immersion in water significantly decreases creep rates in wet macrohybrid layers. While studying neat resins alone, only resin 3 (the most hydrophilic) showed a significant decrease in creep rate after water immersion. Supported by R01-DE014911 from the NIDCR (DP, PI).