Objectives: Compare the convective fluid movements across dentin covered with a smear layer after placement of an experimental coating material, EXM-713, versus an RMGI liner and a nanofilled adhesive control. EXM-713 is a resin-modified glass ionomer coating material.
Methods: Crown segments cut from extracted unerupted third molars were cemented onto plexiglass slabs penetrated by a stainless steel tube allowing filling of the pulp chamber with water under 140 cm H2O pressure. These were attached to a device that measured fluid movement through the dentin. The dentin surface was etched with 37% phosphoric acid for 15 sec to permit measurement of the maximum permeability; three strokes on 320 grit paper yielded a controlled smear layer, which was coated with either 3M ESPE Vitrebond Plus Liner/Base (VBP) or EXM-713. Permeabilty was measured on the etched, smeared, and coated dentin for each sample. A control group, 3M ESPE Adper Single Bond Plus Adhesive (SBP) applied to etched dentin, was also measured. Cross-sectional SEM was done on EXM-713 and VPB. Data were analyzed via one-way ANOVA and Tukey's T-test (p<0.05).
Results: Permeability, in microliter/min @140cmH2O (stdev), is shown below. Groups with the same superscript letter are not significantly different (p>0.05).
Material | n | Etched | Smear | Coated | % Reduction |
EXM-713 | 6 | 14.6(13.1)a | 3.7(2.4)b | 0.25(0.32)c | 96.5(6.0)% |
VBP | 6 | 10.7(7.4)a | 3.2(1.9)b | 0.17(0.25)c | 98.9(1.1)% |
SBP | 10 | 13.8(5.6)a | n/a | 0.9(1.3)c | 93.3(8.0)% |
Conclusions: EXM-713 and VBP are effective at sealing smear-layer-covered dentin and reducing fluid flow through it; both are not statistically different from SBP in their ability to reduce fluid flow. SEM of EXM-713 and VPB showed resin infiltration of the smear layer, resin tags on the etched dentin, and a resin-rich layer at the interface.