Methods: Clustered by subjects, the response measures are the periodontal outcomes averaged over 6 sites of a tooth to yield multiple tooth level data. For comparing measures of location for the two groups, a nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test (henceforth WRST) assuming underlying distributions to be unknown is infeasible here owing to the subject level clustering. Following Rosner et. al. (Biometrics, 2003), we incorporate clustering effects into the Wilcoxon test (henceforth CWRST) and also extend it to control for possible confounding effects by covariates. A large sample approach is used to test the null hypothesis of equality of location measures.
Results: For PPD and BOP, there was no significant difference between the two groups using either test, however, the WRST underestimated the variance by several fold. Ignoring clustering, WRST showed higher CAL value for abnormal glycemic group but CWRST (accounting for clustering) indicated no difference between the two groups. Considering all the three scores and accounting for confounding due to smoking habits which are coded as ever/never' or never/past/present' smoker, it is seen that the CWRST supports more severe periodontal disease for the PGC over the GGC (p value < 0.05).
Conclusions: Accounting for both the clustering and the confounding (smoking) effect, periodontal disease is more severe among the people with PGC in our population.
Support: NIH/NCRR P20 RR-017696