Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate
the in-vitro performance of visual and tactile inspection (VT), VT and
radiographic examination (R) and VT plus R and laser fluorescence (D) for the
detection of occlusal caries.
Methods: 50 non-cavitated molar teeth with deep pits
and fissures were selected. The teeth were evaluated by three independent
examiners visually and with an explorer. The teeth were imaged with a bitewing
radiograph (D speed film) and again evaluated with the radiographic information.
Following measurements with laser fluorescence (DIAGNOdent KaVo, Biberach, Germany), the teeth were evaluated a third time with all data available to the
evaluators. The teeth were sectioned buccolingually for a gold standard'
histologic evaluation with microscopy to determine the presence or absence of
caries that would require surgical intervention for tooth restoration. Binary
evaluation to restore or not restore was made and compared to the gold
standard.
Results: Sensitivity (SE) and Specificity (SP) values (%) for
each group were:
|
SE
|
SP
|
VT
|
62.5 %
|
68.4 %
|
VT + R
|
68.8 %
|
65.0 %
|
VT + R + D
|
57.9 %
|
70.5 %
|
The mean kappa values for inter-examiner agreement were: VT- 0.32 (0.13-0.52), VT+R- 0.32 (0.13-0.52) and VT+R+D- 0.37 (0.34-0.39). A paired t-test
revealed no significant difference between kappa agreements (p>0.05).
Conclusion: Under the conditions of this experiment,
DIAGNOdent did not improve the sensitivity of caries detection or significantly
improve inter-examiner agreement. Supported by the Health Future Foundation.