IADR Abstract Archives

Effect of different surface treatments to increase dental implant biocompatibility

Objectives: Modification of titanium implant surface has potential to ensure clinically favorable performance that several surface modification technologies have been introduced. Among the methods, anodizing method and sol-gel hydroxyapatite coating method have gained much interest due to its roughness and chemical composition of the coating layer. The purpose of this study was to compare bone-implant interface shear strength of four different surface treated implants as time elapsed. Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and removal torque measurement methods were employed to measure implant stability at one week and six week after implantation.

Methods: A total of 80 screw-shaped implant (20 machined, 20 resorbable media blasted (RBM), 20 anodized, and 20 anodized+hydroxyapatite sol-gel coated) were prepared, and one of each group was implanted in the tibia of a New Zealand white rabbit that total 20 of them were used. In order to test the implant stability, each 10 rabbit were sacrificed 1week and 6week later. One-way analysis of variance and the Tukey test were used for statistical analysis.

Results: RFA and removal torque values are shown under the table

 

Time

Machined

RBM

Anodized

Anodized+HA

RFA (ISQ)

1 week

56.2(6.6)

57.2 (8.7)

61.33 (10.5)

62.8 (6.7)

6 week

74.2 (3.1)

76.5 (4.7)

74.8 (5.6)

74.0 (6.9)

Removal torque (N/cm)

1 week

6.2 (2.4)

6.9 (3.2)

7.5 (4.1)

9.7 (4.6)

6 week

27.6 (7.8)

46.9 (7.9)

69.1 (4.0)

70.1 (5.1)

Conclusion: 1. For the measurement of removal torque analysis and implant stability quotients (ISQ) value in RFA, no statistical difference was observed within 1 week groups and 6 weeks groups (p> 0.05). But, significant increase in removal torque and ISQ value was observed in 6 weeks groups compared to 1 week groups (p < 0.05).  2. In the 6 weeks removal torque measurement, no statistical difference was observed  between anodized group and anodized+HA coated group (p> 0.05), but both group showed significant difference compared to RBM group and smooth-machined group (p < 0.05). 3. Anodized and anodized+hydroxyapatite sol-gel coating showed significantly improved bone tissue response to implants, but further study on the effect of hydroxyapatite dissolution is needed.  


Division: IADR General Session
Meeting: 2006 IADR General Session (Brisbane, Australia)
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Year: 2006
Final Presentation ID: 214
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Implantology Research
Authors
  • Lee, Ho-jin  ( Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, N/A, South Korea )
  • Song, Kwang-yeop  ( Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, N/A, South Korea )
  • Yoon, Tae-ho  ( Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, N/A, South Korea )
  • Ahn, Seung-geun  ( Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, N/A, South Korea )
  • Park, Ju-mi  ( Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, N/A, South Korea )
  • Park, Chan-woon  ( Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, N/A, South Korea )
  • SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    Bone (Re)-generation
    06/28/2006