|
| 10Hf | 20Hf | 25Hf | 30Hf | 35Hf | 40Hf | Pure Ti | CP Ti |
| YS(MPa) | 437(30) | 480(19) | 500(24) | 528(23) | 535(37) | 579(24) | 374(14) | 416(32) |
| TS(MPa) | 508(31) | 567(9) | 607(12) | 642(12) | 650(17) | 692(12) | 440(19) | 532(7) |
| El (%) | 10.9(2.2) | 9.3(1.1) | 9.6(1.0) | 7.9(1.4) | 7.2(2.1) | 5.7(2.2) | 13.1(1.4) | 7.1(0.8) |
Results: The diffraction peaks of all the metals tested matched those for a Ti; no b phase peaks were found. Alloys with Hf³25% had significantly (p<0.05) higher YS and TS compared to CP Ti. There were no significant differences (p>0.05) in El among all the Ti-Hf alloys and CP Ti, whereas the El of alloys with Hf³30% was significantly (p<0.05) lower than pure Ti. The ME of all metals tested (105-127GPa) were not significantly different (p>0.05). Conclusion: The cast Ti-Hf alloys tested can be considered viable alternatives to CP Ti since they were stronger than CP Ti and their elongation was similar. This study was partially funded by NIH/NIDCR grant DE 11787.