IADR Abstract Archives

Agreement/Disagreement among different Cephalometric Measurements of Similar Anatomical Phenomena

Objectives: This study measured the agreement/disagreement within several pairs of cephalometric measurements used by different clinicians to quantify essentially similar anatomical phenomena. In different "cephalometric analyses", for example, the relationship between the maxillary and mandibular apical bases is alternatively measured by the Wits Appraisal or by the angle ANB. Similarly the orientation of mandibular plane is alternatively measured relative to the SN line or the Frankfort plane.

Methods: End of treatment lateral skull x-ray images were retrospectively acquired and measured for a random sample of 111 orthodontic patients, treated in the practice of a single expert orthodontist(HP). Different conventional measurements for 5 clinically relevant anatomical phenomena were generated and compared. Each measurement was based on averaged landmark locations made independently by 3 calibrated judges. The paired measurements were correlated and the mutually explained variance was computed as r2 with the residual unexplained variance defined as 1-r2. The r2 value was accepted the proportion of agreement while 1-r2 was taken as a measure of disagreement.

Results: Representative findings are presented in tabular form (where MP= Mandibular Plane; FP=Frankfort Plane; SN=Sella Nasion; AP= Point A Pogonion, NA= Nasion Point A and "_" = "to".)

Phenomenon Measured

Measure #1

Measure #2

r2

1-r2

Mandibular Orientation

MP_FP Angle

MP_SN Ang

0.69

0.31

Apical Base Relationship

ANB Angle

Wits Appraisal

0.58

0.42

Mandibular Incisor Inclination

Incisor_MP Angle

L1_AP Ang

0.40

0.60

Maxillary Incisor Inclination

U1_NA Angle

U1_FP Ang

0.01

0.99

Mandibular Prognathism

SNP Angle

SNB Angle

0.94

0.06

Conclusion: There is great variability in the agreement between pairs or sets of cephalometric measurements that are conventionally assumed to represent the same anatomical relationship. Before concordance is assumed, the relationship of each individual pair of measures needs to be tested.


Division: IADR/AADR/CADR General Session
Meeting: 2004 IADR/AADR/CADR General Session (Honolulu, Hawaii)
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Year: 2004
Final Presentation ID: 1293
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Craniofacial Biology
Authors
  • Nabipour, Shahram  ( University of the Pacific School of Dentistry, San Francisco, CA, USA )
  • Pearson, Helmer  ( University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA )
  • Carlson, Sean Kenneth  ( University of the Pacific School of Dentistry, San Francisco, CA, USA )
  • Boyd, Robert L.  ( University of the Pacific School of Dentistry, San Francisco, CA, USA )
  • Baumrind, Sheldon  ( University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey and University of the Pacific School of Dentistry, San Francisco, CA, USA )
  • SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    Orthodontic Treatment I
    03/11/2004