|
SUBSTRATE |
PREPARATION |
ETCHTANT |
Mean (MPa) |
Std Deviation |
N |
|
Dentin |
Laser |
Acid |
7.130 |
4.3212 |
20 |
|
|
|
Laser |
8.420 |
3.0798 |
20 |
|
|
|
None |
11.295 |
4.2524 |
20 |
|
|
Rotary |
Acid |
11.745 |
5.1420 |
20 |
|
|
|
Laser |
10.363 |
3.9318 |
19 |
|
|
|
None |
9.089 |
3.4893 |
19 |
|
Enamel |
Laser |
Acid |
20.695 |
4.5833 |
20 |
|
|
|
Laser |
19.720 |
5.0305 |
20 |
|
|
|
None |
18.365 |
4.5680 |
20 |
|
|
Rotary |
Acid |
26.205 |
6.7442 |
20 |
|
|
|
Laser |
14.870 |
3.3730 |
20 |
|
|
|
None |
12.935 |
2.3831 |
20 |
The data were analyzed with 2-factor ANOVA, and subsequently with a one-way ANOVA evaluating etch type. Conclusion: Although comparable bond strengths were often achieved with laser preparation and etching, the highest bond strengths achieved in this study were to rotary-prepared, acid-etched enamel and dentin.