Marginal tearing of an elastomer reduces the accuracy of the impression. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the tear strength of various low viscosity elastomers. Methods: Ten materials were tested: Aquasil Ultra XLV and Aquasil Ultra LV (Caulk), Affinity Light Body HF (Clinician’s Choice), Splash Extra Lite (Discus), Take 1 Wash and Extrude Wash (Kerr), Flextime Correct Flow (Kulzer), Examix NDS Injection (GC), and Impregum Penta Soft Light Body and Imprint II Low (3M/ESPE). Five axial notch specimens, measuring 4" x 0.75" x 0.020", were made in a proprietary Plexiglas mold. The mold was filled with impression material, sealed, and immediately placed in a water bath at 350C. At the manufacturer’s recommended mouth removal time, the mold was retrieved from the water bath. The specimens were gripped over the first inch from either end leaving 2 inches of gage length and continuously loaded on an Instron testing machine at a crosshead speed of 10 inch/minute until failure occurred. The data was analyzed by using ANOVA and Tukey’s least significant difference test (p<0.05). Letters (a-e) denote statistically significant differences in tear strength between the groups. Results:
Impression Material | Tear Strength (Psi) |
Aquasil Ultra XLV | 494.0 + 38.0 a |
Aquasil Ultra LV | 483.8 + 18.8 b |
Affinity Light Body HF | 324.7 + 34.5 c |
Splash Extra Lite | 290.5 + 23.4 c |
Take 1 Wash | 253.8 + 37.0 d |
Extrude Wash | 251.0 + 18.8 d |
Flexitime Correct Flow | 243.3 + 20.5 d |
Examix NDS Injection | 207.9 + 38.6 e |
Impregum Penta Soft Light Body | 199.2 + 14.5 e |
Imprint II Low Viscosity | 195.9 + 8.4 e |
Conclusions: Resistance to marginal tearing may be affected due to significant differences in the tear strength of low viscosity elastomeric impression materials. This research was supported in part by Dentsply Caulk.