IADR Abstract Archives

Tear Strength of Low-viscosity Elastomeric Impression Materials

Marginal tearing of an elastomer reduces the accuracy of the impression. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the tear strength of various low viscosity elastomers. Methods: Ten materials were tested: Aquasil Ultra XLV and Aquasil Ultra LV (Caulk), Affinity Light Body HF (Clinician’s Choice), Splash Extra Lite (Discus), Take 1 Wash and Extrude Wash (Kerr), Flextime Correct Flow (Kulzer), Examix NDS Injection (GC), and Impregum Penta Soft Light Body and Imprint II Low (3M/ESPE). Five axial notch specimens, measuring 4" x 0.75" x 0.020", were made in a proprietary Plexiglas mold. The mold was filled with impression material, sealed, and immediately placed in a water bath at 350C.  At the manufacturer’s recommended mouth removal time, the mold was retrieved from the water bath. The specimens were gripped over the first inch from either end leaving 2 inches of gage length and continuously loaded on an Instron testing machine at a crosshead speed of 10 inch/minute until failure occurred. The data was analyzed by using ANOVA and Tukey’s least significant difference test (p<0.05). Letters (a-e) denote statistically significant differences in tear strength between the groups. Results:

Impression Material

Tear Strength (Psi)

Aquasil Ultra XLV

494.0 + 38.0                       a

Aquasil Ultra LV

483.8 + 18.8                       b

Affinity Light Body HF

324.7 + 34.5                       c

Splash Extra Lite

290.5 + 23.4                       c

Take 1 Wash

253.8 + 37.0                       d

Extrude Wash

251.0 + 18.8                       d

Flexitime Correct Flow

243.3 + 20.5                       d

Examix NDS Injection

207.9 + 38.6                       e

Impregum Penta Soft Light Body

199.2 + 14.5                       e

Imprint II Low Viscosity

195.9 + 8.4                         e

Conclusions: Resistance to marginal tearing may be affected due to significant differences in the tear strength of low viscosity elastomeric impression materials. This research was supported in part by Dentsply Caulk.


AADR/CADR Annual Meeting
2003 AADR/CADR Annual Meeting (San Antonio, Texas)
San Antonio, Texas
2003
137
Dental Materials: VIII - Others-Non-metallic
  • Boghosian, Alan  ( Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA )
  • Lautenschlager, Eugene P.  ( Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA )
  • Oral
    Properties of Orthodontic Materials, Impression Materials, Investment Materials, and Handpieces
    03/13/2003