IADR Abstract Archives

Effect of Energy Density on Marginal Integrity in Class 2 Composite Restorations

Objectives: determine in vitro the minimal degree of cure required by the base of a restoration to maintain marginal seal under thermal-mechanical stress conditions. Methods: Composite (Z250/Single Bond, 3M ESPE) was placed in bulk or incrementally (control) into Class 2 slot preparations with dentinal gingival margins in human molars and light cured with various energy densities and subjected to 1000 thermal-cycles & 500,000 fatigue cycles from 18 - 85 N with a stainless-steel sphere (n=8).  Marginal integrity was evaluated using ridit analysis.  Degree of conversion (DC) and Knoop hardness (KHN) were determined at the occlusal & gingival surfaces using a reusable tooth template with identical preparation dimensions (n=3). Percentage of maximum DC and KHN were determined. Results: Thermal-mechanical stressing did not significantly affect gingival marginal defects (p=0.17). Water had a significant dissolving effect on marginal integrity at low degrees of conversion (paired t-test; p<0.05). Energy density had a significant effect on gingival marginal defects (ANOVA/Tukey’s; p<.001).  Heavy marginal degradation was seen in the 4000 mJ/cm2 group.  Although there were no significant differences in ridit scores between the control, 24000 and 6000 mJ/cm2 groups there was evidence of other marginal deterioration (discoloration, opacity) with 6000 mJ/cm2 group. Conclusion: lower limit of gingival margin acceptability in bulk-filled Z250 composite restoration was created by energy densities producing a recommended 80% of maximum DC & 73% of maximum KHN as seen with 24000 mJ/cm2. Funding by 3M and NIH/NIDCR 09431. Table: a-c denote significant differences by energy density.

                                                                        

Energy Density mJ/cm2

4000(water only)

4000

6000

8000

12000

24000

Control (24000x3)

Ging DC (% max)

24.5(5.1)

24.5(5.1)

45.0(4.4)

57.3(0.2)

67.6(2.3)

80.0(0.9)

97.0(1.6)

Ging KHN (% max)

2.8(3.6)

2.8(3.6)

22.6(0.8)

39.2(4.5)

54.1(0.3)

72.8(0.3)

96.5(1.2)

Ridit (pre-stress)

4.0(1.9)

4.7(2.7)

2.5(1.2)

3.3(1.4)

3.9(0.9)

3.0(0.6)

2.4(1.2)

Ridit (500K cycles)

6.3(2.4)c

6.0(3.8)c

2.8(1.3)a

4.2(1.0)b,c

4.1(0.8)b,c

3.2(0.6)a,b

2.3(0.8)a

 


Division: AADR/CADR Annual Meeting
Meeting: 2003 AADR/CADR Annual Meeting (San Antonio, Texas)
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Year: 2003
Final Presentation ID: 39
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Dental Materials: VI - Polymer Materials-Mechanical Properties and Degradation
Authors
  • Vandewalle, K.s.  ( USAF Dental Investigation Service, Great Lakes Naval Station, IL, USA )
  • Ferracane, J.l.  ( Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA )
  • Hilton, T.j.  ( Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA )
  • Sakaguchi, R.l.  ( Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA )
  • SESSION INFORMATION
    Oral
    Polymer Materials: Photopolymerization; Mechanical Properties
    03/12/2003