One major trend in luting ceramic inlays today is to simplify the luting procedure. RelyX UnicemR was introduced for luting adhesive inlays without any pre-treatment of dental hard tissues. Objectives: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the wear behavior of RelyX UnicemR in comparison to three conventional resin luting cements and one glass ionomer cement (GIC).
Methods: Sixty Class I CERECR inlays (Vita-MarkR II) were adhesively inserted into cavities having been placed in IPS EmpressR samples to simulate surrounding enamal. The luting materials were (n = 10 per group): RelyX UnicemR auto cure (U-auto), RelyX UnicemR dual cure (U-dual), CompoluteR (CL), PanaviaR F (Pan), VariolinkR II Low (VL), and Fuji CemR (FC). Wear was simulated by the ACTA method (DeGee 1986). 3D-measurements of the specimens were carried out with a profilometer (Perthen S3P) after 200.000 cycles. The average widths and the average depths of the luting gaps were evaluated by the software XPertR for Windows.
Results: After 2 x 105 cycles the following average luting space wear rates were detected [µm] (SD):
U-auto U-dual CL Pan VL FC
Width 190 (50) 175 (43) 179 (74) 220 (73) 194 (54) 167 (41)
Depth 23 (10) 17 (4) 15 (3) 17 (3) 15 (4) 32 (11)
Conclusions: There were no significant differences in luting gap width (ANOVA, mod. LSD, p>.05). The highest wear rates were calculated for GIC FC and the U-auto (p<.05). All other materials exhibited no significant differences (p<.05). For luting of adhesive inlays with RelyX UnicemR we recommend additional light-curing.