A
long-standing physiologic question in orthodontics is to what extent fiber type
content of masticatory muscles varies with craniofacial morphology.
Objective:
To determine, in the case of a middle aged male who underwent surgical
correction of a severe class III malocclusion, if the fiber type composition of
masseter muscle is significantly different in comparison to a group of 40
subjects undergoing orthognathic surgery for treatment of less severe
malocclusions (a mixed population of class II, class III, open bite and deep
bite morphologies).
Methods:
Orthodontic diagnosis: The subject was characterized as a severe class
III malocclusion using the McNamara cephalometric analysis and Grummons frontal
analysis. Craniofacial morphometric data for fiber types in the comparison
group have been presented previously in an abstract.1 Fiber type
analysis: Masseter tissue biopsies were excised during surgical
repositioning of the mandible. From serial sections fiber type and average
area were determined by immunohistochemical staining and morphometric analysis.1
Fiber type classes were condensed into the following groups: type I
containing type I myosin heavy chain (MHC), type II IIA and/or IIX MHC, type
I/II hybrid fibers I and IIA or IIX, and type neonatal/atrial neonatal
and/or α cardiac MHC in addition to other myosins.
Results:
For our subject all four fiber type classes were notably larger. The mean
fiber area (μm2) for comparison group vs. the case subject was
as follows:
|
|
Type I
|
Type II
|
Type I/II hybrid
|
Type neo/atrial
|
|
Subject
|
4,611.1 μm2
|
5,828.03
|
4,162.16
|
1,439.99
|
|
Control group
|
2,167.7 μm2
|
784.97
|
1,592.53
|
923.21
|
Conclusion:
This report demonstrates that fiber type differences vary in accordance with
the severity of malocclusion.
1. Daniel Y, Ferri J, Krivosic-Horber R, McDonald F, Raoul
G, the late H. Reyford, Rowlerson A. Masseter muscle fiber types in relation to
craniofacial form. J Physiol 2001;531:154-155P.