IADR Abstract Archives

Developing and weighting criteria for resource allocation in NHS dentistry

Objectives: When allocating health service resources, many disparate criteria must be considered simultaneously. This process is often informal and only considers the decision-maker’s perspective. Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) is a tool used to formalise the decision-making process and ensure all stakeholders are represented. The objective was to construct a dental MCDM.
Methods: Using purposive sampling a focus group comprising of health service managers (n=2), dentists (n=3), dental public health consultants (n=2), health economists (n=1) and public/patient representatives (n=2) was established. This group identified a range of criteria, which the academic team formalised. These were then agreed by the group, who independently weighted the importance of each criterion. An average of these scores was generated.
Results: See table.


When examining individual scores there is little convergence according to role. Only one participant awarded a weight of 0 to any criteria/sub-criteria.
Conclusions: A MCDM tool was created which was acceptable to stakeholders and could be used to assist in prioritisation of services within NHS dentistry.
IADR/AADR/CADR General Session
2019 IADR/AADR/CADR General Session (Vancouver, BC, Canada)
Vancouver, BC, Canada
2019
0083
Behavioral, Epidemiologic and Health Services Research
  • Carr, Katherine  ( Newcastle University , Gateshead , United Kingdom )
  • Vernazza, Christopher  ( Newcastle University , Gateshead , United Kingdom )
  • Holmes, Richard  ( Newcastle University , Gateshead , United Kingdom )
  • Donaldson, Cam  ( Glasgow Caledonian University , Glasgow , United Kingdom )
  • Gray, Joanne  ( Northumbria University , Newcastle Upon Tyne , United Kingdom )
  • Exley, Catherine  ( Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University , Newcastle Upon Tyne , United Kingdom )
  • Wildman, John  ( Newcastle University Business School, Newcastle University , Newcastle Upon Tyne , United Kingdom )
  • National Institute of Health Research, Clinician Scientist Award (CS-2014-14-011)
    NONE
    Oral Session
    Dental Workforce Planning and Evaluation
    Wednesday, 06/19/2019 , 08:30AM - 10:00AM
    Criteria and weights
    CriteriaWeight (%)Sub-criteriaWeight within main criterion (%)
    Benefit22.8Evidence Base26
    Size of problem15.4
    Volume service treats14.9
    QoL Improvement19.9
    Longevity of benefit14
    Societal benefit9.9
    Cost8.2UDA per minute18.4
    Cost per QoL improvement47.4
    Total cost34.2
    Cost-benefit12.8Total cost less societal benefit100
    Preventative13.9Prevention level54
    Evidence Base46
    Inequalities11.8Effects vertical inequality45.8
    Effects horizontal inequality54.2
    Safe/acceptable9.1Risk of untoward complication26.8
    Longevity of side effects27.6
    Pain associated with procedure19.2
    Acceptable to patients26.3
    Workforce7.2Need to retrain workforce55
    Uses DCPs45
    Politically Acceptable2.8Ministers likely to implement change100
    Patient responsibility5.8Onus on patient to care for oral health100
    Innovation2.9Current usage100
    Aesthetics2.7Intended to affect aesthetics40
    Evidence base60