Synergistic Antibacterial Efficacy Enables Determination of Optimal aPDT-Disinfectant Combinations
Objectives: Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) is a promising antibacterial approach. Due to different mechanisms of action of aPDT and disinfectants, the combined use of aPDT and a disinfectant may lead to a synergistic antibacterial efficacy. We investigated treatment concentration combinations of aPDT (TMPyP) and each one of the disinfectants Chlorhexidine-digluconate (CHX) or Benzalkonium-chloride (BAC) used in daily clinical practice. Methods: The antimicrobial photodynamic effect of light-activated TMPyP (5,10,15,20-Tetrakis(1-methyl-4-pyridinio)porphyrin-tetra(p-toluenesulfonate), 15.3mW/cm2, 9.2J/cm2, λem:380-480nm) against Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC25923), Escherichia coli (ATCC25922), and Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC4083) was determined by plating of treated and untreated broth cultures and compared to the effect of disinfectants BAC and CHX. Minimal inhibitory concentration of CHX or BAC alone and in combination with aPDT were determined using the checkerboard method (n= 6) to evaluate optimal treatment concentrations of combinations from aPDT and each disinfectant. A concentration of such combination was defined optimal, if (i) all bacteria could be eradicated, (ii) each component (aPDT, disinfectant) of this combination was not higher than the single concentration necessary to eradicate the bacteria alone, and (iii) a certain decrease of one of these concentrations caused a higher increase of the other concentration compared to all other treatment concentration combinations that eradicated all bacteria. Results: Optimal synergistic treatment concentration combinations could be detected in all cases. Results for E. faecalis see Table Conclusions: The existence of an optimal treatment concentration combination of aPDT and standard disinfectants on E. coli, E. faecalis, and S. aureus showed (i) an antibacterial effect of the combined treatment, (ii) that the concentration of the treatment combination was lower than the concentration necessary for eradication by the respective single treatment (synergistic effect), and (iii) that a substitution of one concentration by the other causes higher changes for all other combinations eradicating all bacteria.
Division: IADR/AADR/CADR General Session
Meeting:2019 IADR/AADR/CADR General Session (Vancouver, BC, Canada) Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Year: 2019 Final Presentation ID:3201 Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s):Microbiology/Immunology
Authors
Hiller, Karl-anton
( University Medical Center Regensburg
, Regensburg
, Germany
)
Forster, Eva-maria
( University Medical Center Regensburg
, Regensburg
, Germany
; Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Regensburg
, Regensburg
, Germany
)
Cieplik, Fabian
( University Medical Center Regensburg
, Regensburg
, Germany
)
Buchalla, Wolfgang
( University Medical Center Regensburg
, Regensburg
, Germany
)
Maisch, Tim
( Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Regensburg
, Regensburg
, Germany
)
Financial Interest Disclosure: NONE
SESSION INFORMATION
Poster Session
Antimicrobial Strategies and Therapies II
Saturday,
06/22/2019
, 11:00AM - 12:15PM
TABLES
Results for E faecalis
disinfectant
aPDT alone [µg/ml]
disinfectant alone [µg/ml]
optimal synergistic treatment concentration combination of aPDT and disinfectant