IADR Abstract Archives

Safety Checklist for Restorative Dentistry: Development and Validation

Objectives: Safety checklists have been proved to successfully decrease the prevalence of adverse events (AE) caused by health providers’ negligence. Implementing the World Health Organization (WHO) “Surgical Safety Checklist” resulted in significant decrease in deaths and in-hospital complications. Unfortunately, dentistry is far behind in patient safety practices. Therefore, we aimed to develop a restorative dentistry checklist to minimize AEs in undergraduate clinic following the principles used to develop WHO Surgical Safety Checklist.
Methods: This study was performed in three phases: first, identifying the most common AEs in restorative dentistry and their causative errors, second; developing the checklist, and third; validating it. To identify the most common AEs, dental records of McGill undergraduate clinic were searched for cases of refunded patients from 2012-2014. Errors in those cases were identified and classified by two specialists. Based on the most frequent errors, the checklist was drafted. The checklist was validated by assessing the dentists’ perception of the importance of each checklist item for restorative dentistry practice. Finally, undergraduate students (n=48) were surveyed after clinical sessions to assess whether students forget to address any of the checklist items during the sessions.
Results: Fifty-four errors were identified in 46 cases of refunded patients. Pre-operative errors were the most prevalent (54%), followed by intra-operative errors (33%). Based on these errors, the checklist was drafted into three parts; a treatment planning part, a during-treatment part to be used before starting a dental procedure and a post-treatment part to be used before dismissing the patient. The checklist was validated by the positive perception of the checklist items expressed by dentists (n=11). Thirteen out of the 48 students surveyed (27%) forgot at least one checklist item, associated with adverse event, during clinical sessions, which indicate the potential importance of the validated checklist.
Conclusions: Adverse events in dentistry are mostly caused by preventable errors. Checklist can be produced to address those errors. In about 27% of clinical interventions, students forgot to address at least one of the checklist items which indicates the potential importance of its implementation.
IADR/AADR/CADR General Session
2019 IADR/AADR/CADR General Session (Vancouver, BC, Canada)
Vancouver, BC, Canada
2019
2002
Evidence-based Dentistry Network
  • Almufleh, Balqees  ( McGill University , Montreal , Quebec , Canada ;  King Saud University , Riyadh , Saudi Arabia )
  • Tamimi, Faleh  ( McGill University , Montreal , Quebec , Canada )
  • Emami, Elham  ( McGill University , Montreal , Quebec , Canada )
  • Abi Nader, Samer  ( McGill University , Montreal , Quebec , Canada )
  • Myers, Jeffrey  ( McGill University , Montreal , Quebec , Canada )
  • Adamczyk, Jessica  ( McGill University , Montreal , Quebec , Canada )
  • Chisholm, Alicia  ( McGill University , Montreal , Quebec , Canada )
  • Pollock, Natalie  ( McGill University , Montreal , Quebec , Canada )
  • Franco Echevarria, Maria  ( McGill University , Montreal , Quebec , Canada )
  • Malixi, Jodeci  ( McGill University , Montreal , Quebec , Canada )
  • None
    Poster Session
    Evidence-based Dentistry Network I
    Friday, 06/21/2019 , 11:00AM - 12:15PM
    Restorative Dentistry Safety Checklist
    Treatment PlanningBefore you touch the toothBefore you dismiss the patient
    1. Did you check the radiograph?
    (bone level, caries, restoration, remaining tooth structure, periapical radiolucency)
    Yes
    No
    N/A
    7. Did you check the treatment plan?Yes
    No
    N/A
    11. Did you complete all the steps of the treatment?Yes
    No
    N/A
    2. Are the radiographs recent (< 6 months)?Yes
    No
    N/A
    8. Is there any anatomical concerns to revise before starting? (Canal locations, shape of access cavity, ridge resorption)Yes
    No
    N/A
    12. Do you need to revise your treatment plan?Yes
    No
    N/A
    3. Did you explain the treatment to the patient? (expectations, needed steps, times and fees)Yes
    No
    N/A
    Restorative Treatment
    9. Did you check the extensions of your tray?
    Yes
    No
    N/A
    Removable Treatment
    13. Did you check the vertical dimension?
    Yes
    No
    N/A
    4. Are there any occlusal concerns?
    (bruxism, occlusal interference in lateral jaw movements)
    Yes
    No
    N/A
    Restorative Treatment
    10. Did you isolate the tooth with rubber dam?
    Yes
    No
    N/A
    Removable Treatment
    14. Is the patient able to bite properly?
    Yes
    No
    N/A
    5. Did you check tooth mobility and/or pockets?Yes
    No
    N/A
    Removable Treatment
    15. Is the denture overextended?
    Yes
    No
    N/A
    6. Is there enough tooth structure for filling OR enough ferrule for a crown?Yes
    No
    N/A
    Restorative Treatment
    16. Did you check the margins of the restoration?
    Yes
    No
    N/A
    Restorative Treatment
    16. Did you check the proximal contacts?
    Yes
    No
    N/A
    Restorative Treatment
    17. Did you check the centric and eccentric contacts?
    Yes
    No
    N/A
    Impressions
    19. Did you capture all anatomical details required?
    Yes
    No
    N/A
    Impressions
    20. Is the impression over/underextended?
    Yes
    No
    N/A
    N/A: not applicable
    Errors identified in the cases of refund organized by speciality and nature of errors
    SpecialityPatients refunded (n)Errors identified (n)Type of errorsNature of errorsn
    RPD45TechnicalRegistration of maxillomandibular relation2
    CommunicationTreatment expectation3
    CD67TechnicalRegistration of maxillomandibular relation2
    MiscommunicationTreatment and esthetic expectations4
    MisdiagnosisResorbed ridge1
    Crowns1923Treatment planningDefect was large, and post and core was probably indicated, tooth fractured upon removal of provisional restorations4
    MisdiagnosisEvaluation of restorability determined too late (radiograph not checked/not recent, ferrule effect not available, periodontal prognosis is poor)
    Occlusal factors not assessed well
    8


    2
    TechnicalCaries removal
    Under/over tooth preparation
    Open margin/proximal contact
    5
    2
    2
    Fillings911Treatment planningCavity was large, and patient had history of restoration fracture5
    MisdiagnosisRestoration on a tooth planned for crown or with poor periodontal prognosis2
    TechnicalOpen margin/proximal contact
    Moisture control
    Occlusion not checked
    1
    2
    1
    Root canal treatment44TechnicalRoot perforation
    Inadequate anesthesia
    2
    1
    MiscommunicationPatient did not complete RCT when he lately knew he must pay for post and core and crown too1
    Periodontal treatment22TechnicalCalculus not removed in scaling1
    Treatment planningPocket reduction followed by surgical extraction in another visit1
    Orthodontics22MisdiagnosisRadiographic root resorption was not identified, brackets bonded before finalizing treatment plan2
    Total4654 
    RPD: removable partial denture CD: complete denture