IADR Abstract Archives

Erosion-protecting Effect on Root Dentin.

Objectives: This in vitro study evaluated the effect of different treatments on the prevention of root dentin wear.
Methods: One hundred and eighty slabs of bovine root dentin (4x3x2mm) were ground flat, polished and covered with composite resin except for two-thirds their outer surface (8mm2) to obtain a reference surface. The specimens were submitted to an initial erosive challenge with hydrochloric acid (HCl; pH=1.2; 0.1M, 20s, 3x). According to a randomized complete block design, the specimens were divided into three groups according to the following treatments (n=20): no treatment (C-control group), chitosan gel (CH), and TiF4 varnish (TiF4). Afterwards, all specimens were randomly submitted to erosive challenge with liquid (n=10) or gaseous (n=10) HCl (pH=1.2, 6x/day/20s for 6 days). After the third and sixth challenge of the day, half of the specimens were submitted to abrasion (20s, 2x/day), simulating the brushing stokes. The specimens were analyzed by confocal laser microscope for surface roughness (final-initial) and wear (step). The data were analyzed by ANOVA one (challenge) and 2-way (treatmentXabrasion) and Tukey test (α=0.05).
Results: For the erosive challenge, a higher wear value was observed for the liquid HCl (p<0.05), which differed statistically from the gaseous HCl. A similar result was observed for the treatments. The abrasion affected negatively the group eroded with liquid HCl and the lowest wear value was verified for TiF4 (p<0.05). For gaseous HCl, all treatments showed similar values of wear and abrasion not affected (p>0.05)(Table). For the roughness, similar values were observed independent of abrasion (p>0.05) and only varnish was different (p<0.05).
Conclusions: In terms of wear, TiF4 promoted the best protective effect of root dentin eroded with liquid HCl; however, it was affected by abrasion. In the gaseous erosive process, any treatment has the ability to reduce the dentin loss. Surface roughness was not affected by the different treatments.
Division: IADR/AADR/CADR General Session
Meeting: 2019 IADR/AADR/CADR General Session (Vancouver, BC, Canada)
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Year: 2019
Final Presentation ID: 1836
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Cariology Research-Erosion
Authors
  • Faraoni, Juliana  ( University of São Paulo , Ribeirão Preto , Brazil )
  • Yamakami, Shelyn  ( University of São Paulo , Ribeirão Preto , Brazil )
  • Buzalaf, Marília  ( University of São Paulo , Bauru , Brazil )
  • Palma-dibb, Regina  ( University of São Paulo , Ribeirão Preto , Brazil )
  • Support Funding Agency/Grant Number: Fapesp: 2016/23193-7
    Financial Interest Disclosure: NONE
    SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    Cariology Research: Erosion III
    Friday, 06/21/2019 , 11:00AM - 12:15PM
    TABLES
    Means (standard deviations) of wear and surface roughness (Sa) values for root dentin following preventive treatments.
     Wear(μm/LiqHCl)Wear(μm/gaseousHCl)Sa(μm/LiqHCl)Sa(μm/gaseousHCl)
    Control30.51(11.42)a3.06(4.76)a-0.138(0.196)a-0.008(0.257)a
    Chitosan29.60(8.08)a4.28(3.17)a-0.053(0.240)a-0.006(0.274)a
    Varnish17.47(13.38)b3.08(3.73)a-0.124(0.260)a-0.191(0.188)b
    Means followed by the same letter are not statistically different.