Fracture load of 3D printed fixed dental protheses
Objectives: The study investigated the impact of build direction, post-curing and artificial aging of different 3D print materials on fracture load (FL) of FDPs (fixed dental prostheses) for temporary use compared to milled and conventionally fabricated ones. Methods: Monolithic three-unit FDPs were 3D printed using the following materials:experimental resin [EXP], NextDent C&B [CB], Freeprint temp [FT] and 3Delta temp [DT]. In the first part, the impacts of build direction and artificial aging on FL were tested. FDPs from each material were manufactured with their long-axis positioned either occlusal, buccal or distal to the printer’s platform. FL (1mm/min) was measured after artificial aging (H2O: 21 days, 37°C). In the second part, the impact of post-curing on FL was tested. FDPs were post-cured using: Labolight DUO, Otoflash G171 and LC-3DPrint Box. While the positive control group was milled from TelioCAD [TC], the negative control group was fabricated from a conventional temporary material Luxatemp [LT]. These initial FL values were compared to those after aging. Each subgroup contained 15 specimens. Data were analysed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, univariate ANOVA with partial eta squared (ηP2), one-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc Scheffé test, t-test, Kruskal-Wallis- and Mann Whitney U- test (p<0.05). Results: Specimens manufactured with their long-axis positioned distal to the printer’s platformshowed higher FL than occlusal ones (p=0.049). The highest FL values were observed for CB, followed by DT (p<0.001). EXP showed the lowest FL, followed by FT (p<0.001).After artificial aging a decrease of FL for EXP (p<0.001) and DT (p<0.001) was observed. The highest impact on FL was exerted by interactions between 3D print material and post-curing unit (ηP2=0.233, p<0.001), followed by the 3D print material (ηP2=0.219, p<0.001) and curing device (ηP2=0.108, p<0.001). Conclusions: Build direction and post-curing have an impact on the mechanical stability of 3D printed FDPs.
Division: IADR/AADR/CADR General Session
Meeting:2019 IADR/AADR/CADR General Session (Vancouver, BC, Canada) Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Year: 2019 Final Presentation ID:0662 Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s):Dental Materials 2: Polymer-based Materials
Authors
Reymus, Marcel
( University Hospital of Munich
, Munich
, Germany
)