IADR Abstract Archives

Fracture load of 3D printed fixed dental protheses

Objectives: The study investigated the impact of build direction, post-curing and artificial aging of different 3D print materials on fracture load (FL) of FDPs (fixed dental prostheses) for temporary use compared to milled and conventionally fabricated ones.
Methods: Monolithic three-unit FDPs were 3D printed using the following materials:experimental resin [EXP], NextDent C&B [CB], Freeprint temp [FT] and 3Delta temp [DT]. In the first part, the impacts of build direction and artificial aging on FL were tested. FDPs from each material were manufactured with their long-axis positioned either occlusal, buccal or distal to the printer’s platform. FL (1mm/min) was measured after artificial aging (H2O: 21 days, 37°C). In the second part, the impact of post-curing on FL was tested. FDPs were post-cured using: Labolight DUO, Otoflash G171 and LC-3DPrint Box. While the positive control group was milled from TelioCAD [TC], the negative control group was fabricated from a conventional temporary material Luxatemp [LT]. These initial FL values were compared to those after aging. Each subgroup contained 15 specimens. Data were analysed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, univariate ANOVA with partial eta squared (ηP2), one-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc Scheffé test, t-test, Kruskal-Wallis- and Mann Whitney U- test (p<0.05).
Results: Specimens manufactured with their long-axis positioned distal to the printer’s platformshowed higher FL than occlusal ones (p=0.049). The highest FL values were observed for CB, followed by DT (p<0.001). EXP showed the lowest FL, followed by FT (p<0.001).After artificial aging a decrease of FL for EXP (p<0.001) and DT (p<0.001) was observed. The highest impact on FL was exerted by interactions between 3D print material and post-curing unit (ηP2=0.233, p<0.001), followed by the 3D print material (ηP2=0.219, p<0.001) and curing device (ηP2=0.108, p<0.001).
Conclusions: Build direction and post-curing have an impact on the mechanical stability of 3D printed FDPs.
Division: IADR/AADR/CADR General Session
Meeting: 2019 IADR/AADR/CADR General Session (Vancouver, BC, Canada)
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Year: 2019
Final Presentation ID: 0662
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Dental Materials 2: Polymer-based Materials
Authors
  • Reymus, Marcel  ( University Hospital of Munich , Munich , Germany )
  • Fabritius, Rosalie  ( LMU University Hospital , Munich , Germany )
  • Kessler, Andreas  ( University Hospital of Munich , Munich , Germany )
  • Hickel, Reinhard  ( University Hospital of Munich , Munich , Germany )
  • Edelhoff, Daniel  ( LMU University Hospital , Munich , Germany )
  • Stawarczyk, Bogna  ( LMU University Hospital , Munich , Germany )
  • Financial Interest Disclosure: NONE
    SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    Polymer-based Materials I
    Thursday, 06/20/2019 , 11:00AM - 12:15PM
    TABLES
    Descriptive Statistics of the Influence of Post-Curing in N
     EX CB FT DT 
     Mean +/- SDCI 95%Mean +/- SDCI 95%Mean +/- SDCI 95%Mean +/- SDCI 95%
    LL585,4 (+-66,8)[548,3;622,5]775,9 (+-57,6)[739,9;807,8]777,6 (+-95,9)[724,4;830,8]609,6 (+-118,8)[543,5;675,4]
    PB874,3 (+-104,0)[816,5;873,3]871,5 (+-398,1)[651,0;1092,0]598,6 (+-170,1)[504,3;692,9]678,4 (+-193,7)[571,0;785,7]
    OF746,4 (+-62,1)746,4 (+-62,1)1050,4 (+-133,3)[976,4;1124,2]638,0 (+-175,5)[540,6;7352][540,6;735,2][790,6;945,6]