IADR Abstract Archives

Bonding Effectiveness to Zirconia With Different Surface Treatments

Objectives: To evaluate the reliability and micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) of different mechanical surface treatments and adhesive strategies to zirconia.
Methods: 360 specimens of translucent zirconia (Prettau Anterior, Zirkonzahn) were fabricated and randomly assigned into three groups according to the mechanical surface treatment: (1) as-sintered (control), (2) sandblasted with aluminum oxide particles (50μm, 3bar, 15s), and (3) sandblasted with silica-modified aluminum oxide – Cojet sand (30μm, 3bar, 15s). Each group was further divided in three sub-groups, according to the adhesive strategy: (ZD) Z-Prime Plus/Duolink Universal (Bisco), (SR) ScotchBond Universal/Relyx Ultimate (3M ESPE), (P) Panavia SA Cement Plus (Kuraray). Two identically pre-treated specimens were bonded together. After the adhesive protocol, the specimens were stored in distilled water (37°C, 24h) and then subjected to a μTBS test. Failed bonded areas were examined by stereomicroscopy and SEM. EDS analysis was also performed. Data were statistically analyzed (two-way ANOVA and Weibull analysis) at a significance level of 5%.
Results: μTBS values were significantly influenced by the type of mechanical surface treatment (p<0.001) and the interaction between surface treatment and adhesive strategy (p<0.001). The adhesive strategies did not significantly affect the μTBS (p=0.051). Al2O3 and Cojet presented significantly higher μTBS values compared to the as-sintered groups (p<0.05). Al2O3 treated specimens showed significantly higher μTBS values than Cojet (p<0.05). When subjected to pre-treatment with Al2O3 the SR adhesive strategy presented significantly lower μTBS values when compared to other strategies. Weibull analysis results showed that is less reliable to adhere as-sintered zirconia than mechanically pre-treated zirconia. Failure mode analysis was in line with the μTBS data (as-sintered=50% adhesive; (2)=75% mixed; (3)=70% mixed).
Conclusions: Mechanical surface treatments significantly enhanced the μTBS between zirconia and resin cements. Al2O3 showed significant better results than Cojet. The choice of adhesive strategy was not significant, regardless of the mechanical surface treatment.
Division: IADR/PER General Session
Meeting: 2018 IADR/PER General Session (London, England)
Location: London, England
Year: 2018
Final Presentation ID: 1926
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Dental Materials 4: Adhesion
Authors
  • Carracho, Ana  ( Instituto Universitário Egas Moniz , Caparica , Portugal )
  • Carracho, Luis  ( University of Michigan School of Dentistry , Ann Arbor , Michigan , United States )
  • Proença, Luis  ( Instituto Universitário Egas Moniz , Caparica , Portugal ;  Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar Egas Moniz , Lisboa , Portugal )
  • Polido, Mário  ( Instituto Universitário Egas Moniz , Caparica , Portugal ;  Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar Egas Moniz , Lisboa , Portugal )
  • Azul, Ana  ( Instituto Universitário Egas Moniz , Caparica , Portugal ;  Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar Egas Moniz , Lisboa , Portugal )
  • Financial Interest Disclosure: NONE
    SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    Adhesion to Materials Used for Indirect Restorations; Fiber-reinforced Materials
    Friday, 07/27/2018 , 11:00AM - 12:15PM