IADR Abstract Archives

Particle-abrasion of Titanium Abutments Increases Retention for Zirconia Crowns

Objectives: The study objective was to compare the effect of air-borne particle abrasion (APA) and fatigue to retention forces of zirconia crowns cemented with two different heights of titanium abutments.
Methods: Thirty titanium implant abutment bases (Variobase RC, Straumann) 3.5mm (n=15) and 5.5mm (n=15) in height and thirty Y-TZP zirconia crowns were used. The 3.5mm-height titanium bases were allocated to Groups A to D. Group A: (n=10) no surface treatment, Group B: (n=5) surface treatment with APA, Group C: (n=5), fatigue test without surface treatment, and Group D (n=5), fatigue test with APA treatment. Identical group allocation was applied to the 5.5mm-height titanium bases in Groups E to H. All crowns and titanium abutments of the surface-roughening groups were performed APA (50μm, alumina), bonded with a dual-cure resin cement (Panavia V5, Kuraray America), light cured (20s), and applied force (2N, 15min) followed by storing under moist condition (37°C, 24h). The specimens for groups B, D, G and H were tested by cyclic loading of 100,000 cycles in a wet environment under a peak load of 1,800 N. A 'pull-out' test was performed for each specimen using a universal testing machine (Instron 5566A) until complete separation. Maximum tensile loads were recorded for retention forces between crown and abutment. Data were analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey HSD (a=0.05).
Results: Failure pattern was predominantly adhesive. The APA groups recorded significantly higher retention. The 5.5mm-height titanium base showed greater retention than 3.5mm-height, solely in the APA groups. Group H: 5.5mm-height, APA and the fatigue test marked significantly higher retention than the static test group.
Conclusions: The APA treatment on titanium abutments increased the retention with zirconia crowns. The titanium base height had significant influence on retention forces with APA treatment. Except for the group B the fatigue test did not decrease retention forces.
Division: IADR/PER General Session
Meeting: 2018 IADR/PER General Session (London, England)
Location: London, England
Year: 2018
Final Presentation ID: 2705
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Prosthodontics Research
Authors
  • Otsubo, Yuko  ( Boston University Henry M. Goldman School of Dental Medicine , Boston , Massachusetts , United States )
  • Chien, Edward  ( Boston University Henry M. Goldman School of Dental Medicine , Boston , Massachusetts , United States )
  • Fan, Yuwei  ( Boston University Henry M. Goldman School of Dental Medicine , Boston , Massachusetts , United States )
  • Yamamoto, Hideo  ( Boston University Henry M. Goldman School of Dental Medicine , Boston , Massachusetts , United States )
  • Nathanson, Dan  ( Boston University Henry M. Goldman School of Dental Medicine , Boston , Massachusetts , United States )
  • Financial Interest Disclosure: None
    SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    Ceramics and Metals in Prosthodontics
    Friday, 07/27/2018 , 03:45PM - 05:00PM
    TABLES
    Mean and Standard deviation for Pull-Out Retention
    Titanium BaseGroupTreatmentCyclic LoadnMean
    (Newton)
    Std Dev
    3.5mmANon-APAStatic10288.6097.50
    BFatigue5198.7182.94
    CAPAStatic5537.6180.13
    DFatigue5600.1127.23
    5.5mmENon-APAStatic10240.6854.33
    FFatigue5270.9216.43
    GAPAStatic5707.0332.30
    HFatigue5831.1955.50