Effect of Different Desensitizing Agents on Bleached and Unbleached Enamel
Objectives: Evaluated the effect of different desensitizing agents application on bleached and unbleached enamel using surface (KHN) and subsurface microhardness (subKHN), roughness (Ra) and color variation (Cie Lab). Methods: One hundred and sixty tooth blocks were divided into six groups (n=10), according to bleaching treatment (BT) and application of desensitizing agent (DA). G1: without BT and DA; G2: application of DA of potassium nitrate (PN); G3: application of DA of nano-hydroxyapatite (nHA); G4: only BT; G5: application of PN prior BT; G6: application of nHA prior BT. As for BT, three whitening sessions were conducted using 35% hydrogen peroxide. Color, KHN, Ra measurements were taken before (t0) and after (t1) treatment protocols. SubKHN specimens were evaluated to a depth of 125μm, with an interval of 25μm. Two extra samples from each group were analyzed using a scanning electron microscope. KHN and Ra results were analyzed by PROC-MIXED and Tukey–Kramer test. Color changes ΔL, ΔE were evaluated using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey tests, whereas Δa, Δb used the Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn’s test. SubKHN was analyzed by ANOVA multi-factor split-plot method and Tukey test (α=0.05). Results: In ΔE color analysis, the bleached groups did not present difference among them. There was statistical difference between t0-t1 in KHN reduction in G2 and G5. All groups, except for G1, showed an increase in Ra in t1. In subKHN, G2 showed lower microhardness in 25μm depth compared to G1 and G3. G6 showed higher microhardness in all depths differing from G4. Conclusions: Desensitizing agents application did not influence bleaching efficacy. Potassium nitrate application in bleached and unbleached enamel reduced KHN, however it did not reduce subKHN in the bleached group. Nano-hydroxyapatite did not affect KHN and prevented subKHN reduction after bleaching. DA increased unbleached enamel roughness and did not increase bleached enamel roughness.
Division: IADR/AADR/CADR General Session
Meeting:2017 IADR/AADR/CADR General Session (San Francisco, California) Location: San Francisco, California
Year: 2017 Final Presentation ID:3892 Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s):Dental Materials 7: Color and Appearance (Esthetics)
Authors
Zeczkowski, Marília
( Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas
, Piracicaba
, São Paulo
, Brazil
)
Silva, Beatriz
( Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas
, Piracicaba
, Brazil
)
Pereira, Tuane
( Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas
, Piracicaba
, Brazil
)
Públio, Juliana
( Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas
, Piracicaba
, São Paulo
, Brazil
)
Ambrosano, Glaucia
( Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas
, Piracicaba
, Brazil
)
Aguiar, Flávio
( Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas
, Piracicaba
, São Paulo
, Brazil
)
Lima, Débora
( Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas
, Piracicaba
, São Paulo
, Brazil
)
Support Funding Agency/Grant Number: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - "National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development" (Brazil)
Financial Interest Disclosure: NONE
SESSION INFORMATION
Poster Session
Color and Appearance (Esthetics) VI
Saturday,
03/25/2017
, 03:45PM - 05:00PM
TABLES
Surface roughness (standard deviation) as a function of time and group
GROUP
BLEACHING TREATMENT
DESENSITIZING AGENT
Initial (t0)
Final (1)
Group 1
Absent
Absent
0.0585(0.0039) Aa
0.0635(0.0050) Ab
Group 2
Absent
Potassium nitrate
0.0602 (0.0057) Ba
0.0750 (0.0044) Aa
Group 3
Absent
Nano-hydroxyapatite
0.0589 (0.0046) Ba
0.0771 (0.0068) Aa
Group 4
Present
Absent
0.0613 (0.0042) Ba
0.0723 (0.0036) Aa
Group 5
Present
Potassium nitrate
0.0567(0.0051) Ba
0.0820 (0.0096) Aa
Group 6
Present
Nano-hydroxyapatite
0.0597 (0.0045) Ba
0.0737 (0.0049) Aa
There was no significant difference between the groups with and without bleaching in the same conditions of treatment and time (p> 0.05). Means followed by different letters (uppercase horizontally and lowercase vertically comparing desensitizing agent within bleaching and time) show statistical differences ( p> 0.05).
Mean and standard deviation (SD) of Surface Knoop microhardness
GROUP
BLEACHING TREATMENT
DESENSITIZING AGENT
Initial (t0)
Final (t1)
Group 1
Absent
Absent
344.42(18.83) Aa
351.44 (18.06) Aab
Group 2
Absent
Potassium nitrate
361.18 (15.65) Aa
330.56 (19.75) Bb
Group 3
Absent
Nano-hydroxyapatite
364.46 (14.50) Aa
367.46 (11.79) Aa
Group 4
Present
Absent
345.6 (17.66) Aa
*332.2 (18.29) Aab
Group 5
Present
Potassium nitrate
360.64 (14.09) Aa
*317.44 (20.90) Bb
Group 6
Present
Nano-hydroxyapatite
342.46 (14.83) Aa
*347.38 (14.14) Aa
* Differs from the groups without bleaching in the same conditions of desensitizing agent and time (p> 0.05).Means followed by different letters (uppercase horizontally and lowercase vertically comparing desensitizing agent within bleaching and time) show statistical differences ( p≤ 0.05).
Mean and standard deviation of Subsurface Knoop microhardness according to the desensitizing agent and depth
BLEACHING TREATMENT
DEPTH
DESENSITIZING AGENT
Absent
Potassium nitrate
Nano-hydroxyapatite
Absent
25
374.87 (16.49) Aba
360.2 (12.5) Ba
402.3 (18.5) Aa
50
362.60 (17.61) ABab
350.6 (13.6) Bab
394.2 (19.1) Aab
75
351.93 (17.24) Bbc
344.7 (17.5) Bab
398.7 (40.2) Aa
100
338.44 (19.93) Acd
339.7 (13.8) Aab
373.1 (11.9) Abc
125
317.41 (21.02) Bd
330.1 (14.3) ABb
360.9 (20.8) Ac
Present
25
*333.53 (21.43) Ba
386.26 (27.15) Aba
399.00 (11.5) Aa
50
*332.64 (15.18) Ba
356.93 (24.77) Aba
382.80 (16.4) Aab
75
*324.11 (18.38) Bab
346.55 (19.66) ABab
379.30 (9.8) Aab
100
*309.24 (20.31) Bbc
313,26 (24,73) ABb
367.30 (10.5) Abc
125
*296.84 (23.23) Bc
309.23 (24.60) Bc
350.60 (14.2) Ac
* Differs from the groups without bleaching in the same conditions of desensitizing agent and time (p> 0.05).Means followed by different letters (uppercase horizontally and lowercase vertically comparing desensitizing agent within bleaching and time) show statistical differences ( p≤ 0.05).