IADR Abstract Archives

Effect of Different Desensitizing Agents on Bleached and Unbleached Enamel

Objectives: Evaluated the effect of different desensitizing agents application on bleached and unbleached enamel using surface (KHN) and subsurface microhardness (subKHN), roughness (Ra) and color variation (Cie Lab).
Methods: One hundred and sixty tooth blocks were divided into six groups (n=10), according to bleaching treatment (BT) and application of desensitizing agent (DA). G1: without BT and DA; G2: application of DA of potassium nitrate (PN); G3: application of DA of nano-hydroxyapatite (nHA); G4: only BT; G5: application of PN prior BT; G6: application of nHA prior BT. As for BT, three whitening sessions were conducted using 35% hydrogen peroxide. Color, KHN, Ra measurements were taken before (t0) and after (t1) treatment protocols. SubKHN specimens were evaluated to a depth of 125μm, with an interval of 25μm. Two extra samples from each group were analyzed using a scanning electron microscope. KHN and Ra results were analyzed by PROC-MIXED and Tukey–Kramer test. Color changes ΔL, ΔE were evaluated using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey tests, whereas Δa, Δb used the Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn’s test. SubKHN was analyzed by ANOVA multi-factor split-plot method and Tukey test (α=0.05).
Results: In ΔE color analysis, the bleached groups did not present difference among them. There was statistical difference between t0-t1 in KHN reduction in G2 and G5. All groups, except for G1, showed an increase in Ra in t1. In subKHN, G2 showed lower microhardness in 25μm depth compared to G1 and G3. G6 showed higher microhardness in all depths differing from G4.
Conclusions: Desensitizing agents application did not influence bleaching efficacy. Potassium nitrate application in bleached and unbleached enamel reduced KHN, however it did not reduce subKHN in the bleached group. Nano-hydroxyapatite did not affect KHN and prevented subKHN reduction after bleaching. DA increased unbleached enamel roughness and did not increase bleached enamel roughness.
Division: IADR/AADR/CADR General Session
Meeting: 2017 IADR/AADR/CADR General Session (San Francisco, California)
Location: San Francisco, California
Year: 2017
Final Presentation ID: 3892
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Dental Materials 7: Color and Appearance (Esthetics)
Authors
  • Zeczkowski, Marília  ( Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas , Piracicaba , São Paulo , Brazil )
  • Silva, Beatriz  ( Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas , Piracicaba , Brazil )
  • Pereira, Tuane  ( Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas , Piracicaba , Brazil )
  • Públio, Juliana  ( Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas , Piracicaba , São Paulo , Brazil )
  • Ambrosano, Glaucia  ( Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas , Piracicaba , Brazil )
  • Aguiar, Flávio  ( Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas , Piracicaba , São Paulo , Brazil )
  • Lima, Débora  ( Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas , Piracicaba , São Paulo , Brazil )
  • Support Funding Agency/Grant Number: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - "National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development" (Brazil)
    Financial Interest Disclosure: NONE
    SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    Color and Appearance (Esthetics) VI
    Saturday, 03/25/2017 , 03:45PM - 05:00PM
    TABLES
    Surface roughness (standard deviation) as a function of time and group
    GROUPBLEACHING TREATMENTDESENSITIZING AGENTInitial (t0)Final (1)
    Group 1AbsentAbsent0.0585(0.0039) Aa0.0635(0.0050) Ab
    Group 2AbsentPotassium nitrate0.0602 (0.0057) Ba0.0750 (0.0044) Aa
    Group 3AbsentNano-hydroxyapatite0.0589 (0.0046) Ba0.0771 (0.0068) Aa
    Group 4PresentAbsent0.0613 (0.0042) Ba0.0723 (0.0036) Aa
    Group 5PresentPotassium nitrate0.0567(0.0051) Ba0.0820 (0.0096) Aa
    Group 6PresentNano-hydroxyapatite0.0597 (0.0045) Ba0.0737 (0.0049) Aa
    There was no significant difference between the groups with and without bleaching in the same conditions of treatment and time (p> 0.05). Means followed by different letters (uppercase horizontally and lowercase vertically comparing desensitizing agent within bleaching and time) show statistical differences ( p> 0.05).
    Mean and standard deviation (SD) of Surface Knoop microhardness
    GROUP
    BLEACHING TREATMENT
    DESENSITIZING AGENT
    Initial (t0)Final (t1)
    Group 1
    AbsentAbsent344.42(18.83) Aa
    351.44 (18.06) Aab
    Group 2AbsentPotassium nitrate
    361.18 (15.65) Aa
    330.56 (19.75) Bb
    Group 3AbsentNano-hydroxyapatite364.46 (14.50) Aa
    367.46 (11.79) Aa
    Group 4Present
    Absent345.6 (17.66) Aa
    *332.2 (18.29) Aab
    Group 5Present
    Potassium nitrate
    360.64 (14.09) Aa
    *317.44 (20.90) Bb
    Group 6Present
    Nano-hydroxyapatite342.46 (14.83) Aa
    *347.38 (14.14) Aa
    * Differs from the groups without bleaching in the same conditions of desensitizing agent and time (p> 0.05).Means followed by different letters (uppercase horizontally and lowercase vertically comparing desensitizing agent within bleaching and time) show statistical differences ( p≤ 0.05).
    Mean and standard deviation of Subsurface Knoop microhardness according to the desensitizing agent and depth
    BLEACHING TREATMENTDEPTHDESENSITIZING AGENT
    AbsentPotassium nitrateNano-hydroxyapatite
    Absent25374.87 (16.49) Aba
    360.2 (12.5) Ba
    402.3 (18.5) Aa
    50362.60 (17.61) ABab
    350.6 (13.6) Bab
    394.2 (19.1) Aab
    75351.93 (17.24) Bbc
    344.7 (17.5) Bab
    398.7 (40.2) Aa
    100338.44 (19.93) Acd
    339.7 (13.8) Aab
    373.1 (11.9) Abc
    125317.41 (21.02) Bd
    330.1 (14.3) ABb
    360.9 (20.8) Ac
    Present25*333.53 (21.43) Ba
    386.26 (27.15) Aba
    399.00 (11.5) Aa
    50*332.64 (15.18) Ba
    356.93 (24.77) Aba
    382.80 (16.4) Aab
    75*324.11 (18.38) Bab
    346.55 (19.66) ABab
    379.30 (9.8) Aab
    100*309.24 (20.31) Bbc
    313,26 (24,73) ABb
    367.30 (10.5) Abc
    125*296.84 (23.23) Bc
    309.23 (24.60) Bc
    350.60 (14.2) Ac
    * Differs from the groups without bleaching in the same conditions of desensitizing agent and time (p> 0.05).Means followed by different letters (uppercase horizontally and lowercase vertically comparing desensitizing agent within bleaching and time) show statistical differences ( p≤ 0.05).
    IMAGES