IADR Abstract Archives

Airborne-particle Abrasion Increases Surface Roughness of Fiber-reinforced Posts

Objectives: Debonding is the most common complication of fiber-reinforced posts. Airborne-particle abrasion has been suggested to increase the adhesion of resin cements to the surface of fiber posts. However, it is unknown which is the most favorable abrasion protocol. The aim of this study was to compare the surface roughness of three fiber post systems following four airborne-particle abrasion protocols.
Methods: A total 150 posts from 3 manufacturers (A:GT Fiber Post, Dentsply; B:GC Fiber Post, GC America; C:ICELight, Danville) were subjected to the following treatments: 0: no treatment (control), 1: no airborne-particle abrasion – ethanol cleaned, 2: airborne-particle abrasion for 2 seconds/mm2 – ethanol cleaned, 3: airborne-particle abrasion for 5 seconds/mm2 – ethanol cleaned, and 4: airborne-particle abrasion for 10 seconds/ mm2 – ethanol cleaned. Airborne-particle abrasion was performed with 50μm Aluminum Oxide. Each post was observed under a 3D laser microscope (Lext; Olympus). Average roughness in 3-D (Sa) was recorded using a 20X objective lens.
Results: Data were analyzed with 2-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s B test (α=.05)
The mean (SD) Sa roughness (μm) for each of the 15 groups was: GT Fiber Post - 0: 2.21(0.23), 1: 2.51(0.29), 2: 3.47(0.51), 3: 3.92(0.51), 4: 4.10(0.63), GC Fiber Post - 0: 2.25(0.14), 1: 2.71(0.08), 2: 3.32(0.32), 3: 4.24(0.82), 4: 3.68(0.29), ICELight - 0: 2.52(0.18), 1: 2.81(0.19), 2: 3.73(0.25), 3: 3.60(0.25), 4: 3.66(0.41). The interaction between post brands and treatment protocols was statistically significant (P=.000). A statistically significant difference was found between the treatment protocols (P=.000), no significant difference was found between the different post brands (P=.937). Post-hoc test showed lowest roughness for A0, B0, A1, C0, B1 and highest roughness for C2, A3, A4, B3.
Conclusions: Post brand did not affect surface roughness. Air-particle abrasion time significantly affected surface roughness in all post systems. Optimum roughness was observed when post surfaces were treated with 2- 5seconds/mm2 of air-particle abrasion.
Division: IADR/AADR/CADR General Session
Meeting: 2017 IADR/AADR/CADR General Session (San Francisco, California)
Location: San Francisco, California
Year: 2017
Final Presentation ID: 3230
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Dental Materials 2:Polymer-based Materials
Authors
  • Wanserski, Michael  ( Marquette University , Milwaukee , Wisconsin , United States )
  • Maroulakos, Georgios  ( Marquette University , Milwaukee , Wisconsin , United States )
  • Schuler, Ethan  ( Marquette University , Milwaukee , Wisconsin , United States )
  • Eagan, Colin  ( Marquette University , Milwaukee , Wisconsin , United States )
  • Cho, Aaron  ( Marquette University , Milwaukee , Wisconsin , United States )
  • Thompson, Geoffery  ( Marquette University , Milwaukee , Wisconsin , United States )
  • Financial Interest Disclosure: None
    SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    Dental Materials-Polymer-based Materials VII
    Saturday, 03/25/2017 , 11:00AM - 12:15PM
    TABLES
    Mean (SD) surface roughness (Sa ) for each of the described post brands and surface treatments
     Post BrandN (Total)
     ABC
    Surface
    Treatment
    (Sec)
    No Treatment2.21 (0.23)A2.25 (0.14)A2.52 (0.18)AB 
    02.51 (0.29)AB2.71 (0.07)AB2.81 (0.19)B 
    23.47 (0.51)CD3.32 (0.31)C3.73 (0.25)CDEF 
    53.92 (0.51)DEF4.24 (0.82)F3.60 (0.25)CDE 
    104.10 (0.63)EF3.68 (0.29)CDEF3.66 (0.41)CDE 
    N505050150
    Different superscript letter means a statistically significant difference (P<.05). Sa is measured in microns