IADR Abstract Archives

Adhesive/Cements Bond Strength in Self/Total-etch Modes With Light/Auto-polymerization to Dentin/Enamel

Objectives: To measure the shear bond strength of adhesive/cements in self-etch and total-etch modes with light- and auto-polymerization to dentin and enamel.
Methods: Human molars were ground to midcoronal dentin or superficial enamel with 320-grit SiC abrasive. Teeth were divided among 24 groups (n=10) for 4 different adhesive/cement combinations which were used in self-etch and total-etch (when indicated) modes with light- and auto-polymerization to dentin and enamel (see table for groups). Etched groups were etched with 37% phosphoric acid for 20s. Each adhesive was applied onto the tooth with agitation and air thinning. For light-polymerized groups, adhesive was light-polymerized with a curing light (Bluephase; 1200mW/cm2) according to IFU. A Tygon tube (ID=1.5mm) was filled with the corresponding cement and affixed to the surface of each specimen. The specimens were stored in a dark room and the cement was allowed to auto-cure for up to 15 minutes prior to being placed in an incubator (24hr,37°C). The specimens were then tested in a universal testing machine in shear at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min. Shear bond strength was compared by a 3-way ANOVA (“material”, “etch”, and “light”) and Tukey-post hoc analyses (alpha=0.05). Enamel and dentin substrates were analyzed separately.
Results: All factors were significant with dentin and factors “material” and “etch” were significant with enamel.

Conclusions: For dentin: Self-etching provides slightly higher bond than total-etching when light-curing; Total-etching provides slightly higher bond than self-etching when auto-curing(p=.01). For enamel: Total-etching provides higher bond than self-etching(p<.01).

Division: IADR/AADR/CADR General Session
Meeting: 2017 IADR/AADR/CADR General Session (San Francisco, California)
Location: San Francisco, California
Year: 2017
Final Presentation ID: 1389
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Dental Materials 4: Adhesion
Authors
  • Lamba, Suruchi  ( University of alabama at birmingham , Birmingham , Alabama , United States )
  • Burgess, John  ( University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham , Alabama , United States )
  • Lawson, Nathaniel  ( University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham , Alabama , United States )
  • Beck, Preston  ( University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham , Alabama , United States )
  • Nejat, Amir Hossein  ( UNIVERSITY ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM , Birmingham , Alabama , United States )
  • Kulkarni, Prajakta  ( University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Dentistry , Birmingham , Alabama , United States )
  • Financial Interest Disclosure: None
    SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    Dental Materials: Limitations and Advantages of New Resin-based CAD-CAM Blocks
    Thursday, 03/23/2017 , 03:45PM - 05:00PM
    TABLES
    results
       Fitura-bond DC/Bifix
    QM(Voco)
    Scotchbond Universal/Relyx
    Ultimate(3M)
    Optibond XTR/NX3
    (Kerr)
    Universal Primer/Duolink
    Universal
    (Bisco)
    DentinSelf-etchLight-cured15.92±6.925.28±4.937.9±10.223.4±10.2
    Self-cured0±015.4±4.821.4±11.414.5±3
    Total-etchLight-curedNA20.3±11.7NA31.6±3.7
    Self-cured23.8±5.333.0±9.9
    EnamelSelf-etchLight-cured11.8±421±8.931.6±6.214.7±7.8
    Self-cured15.3±6.619.9±8.625.1±14.018.27±9.6
    Total-etchLight-curedNA27.6±9NA27.2±10.9
    Self-cured23.5±9.132.8±13.8