IADR Abstract Archives

Microstructural Evaluation of Y- TZP Roughness After 10% Hydrofluoric Acid Etching

Objectives: The introduction of a partially stabilized zirconium dioxide ceramic (Y-TZP) allowed extensive fixed prostheses to be metal-free. Y-TZP is used partially stabilized with yttrium oxide, stabilizing it in a tetragonal crystalline phase at room temperature. In order to obtain high retention, prevention of infiltration and increased resistance to fracture and fatigue, it’s important to optimize bonding techniques. A strong adhesive bonding depends on micromechanical interlocking and chemical bonding to the ceramic surface, which requires respectively, roughness and activation surface.This research has the purpose to evaluate the surface roughness and crystal structure change of yttria-tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP) after hydrofluoric acid (HF).
Methods: Five sintered blocks were divided according to surface treatment: CC: control group; A: 15min 10% hydrofluoric acid in low viscosity gel (HF) etching; B: 30min 10% HF etching; C: 60min 10% HF etching; AA: air abrasion with 50µm Al2O3 particles. The surfaces were then evaluated under atomic force microscopy (AFM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). AFM measured changes in micro and nano-scale in surface topography. Five runs were made in each specimen, and the mean was taken (table.1 and image.1). The roughness (Ra and Rms) increased with increasing the time of exposing to HF. In XRD analysis monoclinic peak was not observed in groups CC, A, B, C (image.2).
Results: Despite the roughness obtained by acid etching is significantly lower than the sandblasting, based on techniques such as selective etching infiltrating (SIE), it’s believed that a low roughness can optimize adhesion. It has as advantage being considered a soft mechanism, that doesn’t induce tetragonal to monoclinic transformation, keeping the high fracture toughness of the material.
Conclusions: Considering the limitations of the study, it was concluded that HF can etch Y-TZP, creating micro and nano-morphological changes, without inducing zirconia tetragonal-to-monoclinic phase transformation, under tested conditionings.
Division: IADR/AADR/CADR General Session
Meeting: 2017 IADR/AADR/CADR General Session (San Francisco, California)
Location: San Francisco, California
Year: 2017
Final Presentation ID: 2544
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Dental Materials 1: Ceramic-based Materials
Authors
  • Rego, Maria Eliza  ( Federal University of Rio de Janeiro , Rio de Janeiro , Rio de Janeiro , Brazil )
  • Schanuel, Fabiana  ( Federal University of Rio de Janeiro , Rio de Janeiro , Rio de Janeiro , Brazil )
  • Jardim, Paula  ( Federal University of Rio de Janeiro , Rio de Janeiro , Rio de Janeiro , Brazil )
  • Financial Interest Disclosure: NONE
    SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    Adhesion to Dental Ceramics
    Friday, 03/24/2017 , 03:45PM - 05:00PM
    TABLES
    Ra, Rms and Kurtosis taken by AFM
    Group A12345Mean
    Ra
    6,626,756,776,537,766,89
    Rms12,2810,159,9810,7510,1810,67
    Kurtosis38,599,674,626,861,6616,27
    Group B12345 
    Ra11,3111,2310,2410,0912,2211,02
    Rms14,3114,2413,1212,9318,714,66
    Kurtosis0,380,290,730,9212,783,02
    Group C12345 
    Ra12,5712,912,3611,5111,9712,26
    Rms16,4417,7817,0315,9116,4916,73
    Kurtosis1,583,643,813,933,413,27
    Group AA12345 
    Ra99,81114,270,120,15 42,87
    Rms131,95137,481,160,20 53,96
    Kurtosis3,316-0,301,570,91 1,09
    Group CC12345 
    Ra4,784,654,574,304,394,54
    Rms6,216,095,915,695,85,94
    Kurtosis0,872,200,773,842,542,05

    IMAGES