IADR Abstract Archives

Comparison of Elastomer Tear Strengths Immediately and After 24 Hours

Objectives: We studied immediate and 24 hour tear strengths of five currently-used elastomers. Marginal tearing of an elastomer damages the accuracy of a dental impression. During mouth removal and/or cast separation by dental personnel, impression material may tear, causing a repeated impression procedure or an ill-fitting restoration. Thus, elastomer tear strength must be robust enough to present providers with predictable and reliable attributes.
Methods: Five low viscosity, fast set materials were tested: Impregum Soft Quick Step LB (3M Oral Care), VPS Hydro LB (Henry Schein), Take 1 Advanced LB Wash Super Fast (Kerr), Imprint 4 Super Quick Light (3M Oral Care), and Aquasil Ultra+ LV Fast Set (Dentsply Sirona). Axial notch specimens measuring 102 mm x 19 mm with a central notch of 120 µm were made in a proprietary stainless steel injection mold. The mold was conditioned at oral cavity temperature, ~35 oC, the materials were quickly injected into the mold which was plunged into a 35 oC water bath. For the “immediate group,” at the stated mouth removal time, the mold was removed from the bath; it was opened and the specimen was retrieved and immediately installed into grips in a universal testing machine at a gauge length of 50 mm. At 508 mm/min, the specimen was elongated in tensile mode until failure. For the 24 hour group, the same testing was completed the following day after bench aging at 25 oC overnight. Five specimens were made for material/test time groups. Load at failure was recorded and used to calculate the tear strengths in MPa. Statistical analysis (α = 0.05) was carried out by ANOVA techniques and the Tukey-Kramer HSD test identified differences among materials.
Results: Tear strengths of the two conditions are given in the following table. The strongest material was Aquasil Ultra+. The immediate group was weaker than the 24 hour group (p ≤ 0.001) and the individual materials were uniquely different from each other (p ≤ 0.0001.) Additionally, Impregum showed a 20% increase in strength after 24 hours, while the other products slightly improved by ~5%.
Conclusions: Aquasil Ultra+ was the strongest material tested herein and 24 hour aging improves tear strengths.
Division: IADR/AADR/CADR General Session
Meeting: 2017 IADR/AADR/CADR General Session (San Francisco, California)
Location: San Francisco, California
Year: 2017
Final Presentation ID: 1965
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Dental Materials 2:Polymer-based Materials
Authors
  • Le, Lien  ( Sherman Dental Associates , Evanston , Illinois , United States )
  • Boghosian, Alan  ( Northwestern University , Chicago , Illinois , United States )
  • Monaghan, Peter  ( Sherman Dental Associates , Evanston , Illinois , United States )
  • Support Funding Agency/Grant Number: Dentsply Sirona Grant
    Financial Interest Disclosure: Dentsply Sirona
    SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    Dental Materials-Polymer-based Materials IV
    Friday, 03/24/2017 , 11:00AM - 12:15PM
    TABLES
    Results for Mechanical Testing of Elastomer Tear Strengths in Megapascals
     ImpregumVP Mix HPTake 1Imprint 4Aquasil Ultra+
    Immediate2.8 ± 0.29 (1,a)4.3 ± 0.39 (2,c)4.8 ± 0.14 (3,e)6.3 ± 0.34 (4,g)8.1 ± 0.49 (5,i)
    24 Hours3.5 ± 0.31 (6,b)4.4 ± 0.41 (7,d)5.0 ± 0.19 (8,f)6.6 ± 0.27 (9,h)8.4 ± 0.41 (0,j)
    1 – 0 denote significant differences among all materials, a,b; c,d; e,f; g,h; i,j show differences between Immediate and 24 Hour Pairings