Impact of Beam Profile on Resin-Composite Conversion and Micro-flexural Strength
Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of curing-light beam profile of multiple light curing units (LCUs) on the degree of conversion (DC) and micro-flexural strength (μ-flexural strength) of a RMC. Methods: Forty-five nano-filled hybrid RMC (Tetric EvoCeram, Ivoclar Vivadent, Amherst, NY) specimens were fabricated. Quartz-tungsten-halogen (QTH) (Optilux 401) (O), polywave (VALO Cordless) (V) and monowave (Demi Ultra) (DU) light-emitting-diode (LED) LCUs were investigated at different light-curing locations (LCLs): (1) the center of the LCU; (2) 1.5 mm to the left of the center of the LCU; and (3) 1.5 mm to the right of the center of the LCU. Specimens were stored wet in deionized water at 37oC for 24 hours. The DC was measured on top and bottom surfaces using Attenuated Total Reflectance-Fourier Transform Infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy. Micro-flexural strength testing was performed using a universal mechanical testing machine at crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Multi-factorial ANOVAs were used to analyze the data (α=0.05). Results: All LCUs exhibited significant differences in DC between top and bottom surfaces at the different LCLs (Table I). Micro-flexural strength varied with LCL for DU (Table II). Conclusions: The inhomogeneous curing-light beam profile could have a significant effect on μ-flexural strength and DC on top and bottom surfaces of RMC specimens cured at different LCLs using multiple LCUs.
IADR/AADR/CADR General Session
2017 IADR/AADR/CADR General Session (San Francisco, California) San Francisco, California
2017 3221 Dental Materials 2:Polymer-based Materials
Eshmawi, Yousef
( Indiana University School of Dentistry
, Indianapolis
, Indiana
, United States
)
Al-zain, Afnan
( IUPUI
, Indianapolis
, Indiana
, United States
)
Eckert, George
( Indiana University School of Medicine
, Indianapolis
, Indiana
, United States
)
Platt, Jeffrey
( Indiana University
, Indianapolis
, Indiana
, United States
)
TABLE I. %Degree of conversion mean (SE) for the LCUs at different locations.
Light Curing Location
LCU
Surface
1
2
3
DU
Top
54.3 (3.0)bBβ
65.8 (2.0)aAα
62.3 (1.1)aAα
Bottom
60.7 (2.7)aAα
57.5 (1.9)bAα
58.5 (2.2)aAα
QTH
Top
61.5 (0.8)aAα
57.6 (0.4)aAβ
57.8 (2.3)aAα
Bottom
55.2 (1.2)bAβ
52.9 (1.9)bAβ
52.3 (2.6)bAβ
V
Top
52.0 (0.6)aBβ
63.0 (1.3)aAα
60.6 (1.8)aAα
Bottom
52.4 (2.4)aAβ
50.5 (2.4)bAβ
49.7 (1.5)bAβ
Superscript letters represent statistical groups: lowercase between top and bottom surfaces for each LCU; uppercase letters in the same row; Greek letters between LCUs for each surface.
TABLE II. μ-flexural strength (MPa) mean (SE) for the LCUs at different locations.
Light Curing Location
LCU
1
2
3
DU
313 (31)bB
400 (13)aA
369 (10)bAB
QTH
401 (12)aA
425 (16)aA
405 (2)aA
V
417 (13)aA
418 (5)aA
458 (21)aA
Superscript letters represent statistical groups: lowercase in the same column; uppercase in the same row.