IADR Abstract Archives

Bottom-to-Top Conversion Values Among Biocompatible Resin Composites

Objectives: To compare the ability of new biocompatible composites, and a variety of contemporary composites, to provide 10-minute bottom-surface monomer conversion (MC) values, which approach that of the top, 4-hour old irradiated surface (percent maximum monomer conversion (PMMC)).
Methods: Composite materials were used in recommended, 2-mm thick increments, or as bulk-fill materials (4mm) (see Table). The biocompatible materials are said to contain no Bis-GMA-like monomers, and one states no leachable monomeric component (Table (*)). Uncured composite discs (2 or 4 mm thick) were placed on the surface of a horizontal attenuated total reflectance unit in an FTIR spectrometer, and bottom surface spectra were collected over time (1 scan/s for 10 min, 2 cm-1 resolution). The first 5 scans collected uncured spectra, the curing light was the activated (Table), and data continued to be collected. MC was calculated at 10 min by comparing changes in the ratio of aliphatic-to-aromatic C=C peak absorbances between uncured and cured states. (N=5) Spectra of the top, irradiated surfaces were obtained 4-hours after exposure, MC was calculated (N=3), and the mean top MC was determined. The percentage of maximum, 4-h top surface MC that each bottom surface attained after 10min (PMCC) was determined. Percentages were compared using a 1-way ANOVA, and Tukey’s post-hoc test at a pre-set alpha of 0.05.
Results: Table presents results. Bottom surface PMCC of Tetric EvoCeram was significantly less than all 2-mm thick products, which were not significantly different from each other. Two bulk-fill, 4-mm thick products had bottom surface PMCC values not significantly from many of those of the 2-mm thick products, but the remainder were all significantly less.
Conclusions: One of the new biocompatible composites demonstrated high proportion of bottom surface conversion values with respect to that of the top, irradiated surface, and also performed well at 4-mm thickness.
Division: IADR/AADR/CADR General Session
Meeting: 2017 IADR/AADR/CADR General Session (San Francisco, California)
Location: San Francisco, California
Year: 2017
Final Presentation ID: 1952
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Dental Materials 2:Polymer-based Materials
Authors
  • Jock, Brian  ( Dental College of Georgia at Augusta University , Augusta , Georgia , United States )
  • Berganske, Shelley  ( Dental College of Georgia at Augusta University , Augusta , Georgia , United States )
  • Mettenburg, Donald  ( Dental College of Georgia at Augusta University , Augusta , Georgia , United States )
  • Shoemaker, Andrew  ( Dental College of Georgia at Augusta University , Augusta , Georgia , United States )
  • Rueggeberg, Frederick  ( Dental College of Georgia at Augusta University , Augusta , Georgia , United States )
  • Support Funding Agency/Grant Number: Travel supported by Thomas P. Hinman/DCG Endowment Fund
    Financial Interest Disclosure: NONE
    SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    Dental Materials-Polymer-based Materials IV
    Friday, 03/24/2017 , 11:00AM - 12:15PM
    TABLES
    Percent of maximum monomer conversion (PMMC) (+/- SD) measured at specific composite thicknesses
      NEW, BIOCOMPATIBLE COMPOSITESCONTEMPORARY COMPOSITES
      ACTIVA KIDSACTIVA RESTORATIVEADMIRA FUSIONADMIRA FUSION x-traTETRIC EVOCERAMTETRIC EVOCERAM BULKPREMISESONICFILL 2
     MANUFACTURERPULPDENTVOCOIVOCLAR / VIVADENTKERR DENTAL
     SHADEPedoA2A2UniversalA2IVAA2A2
     CURING LIGHT / EXPOSURE (s)Elipar S10 / 20sBluephase STYLE / 10sDemi Ultra / 10s
    COMPOSITE THICKNESS2 mm Incremental Fill78.9 (2.6) ABCD81.4 (3.6) ABC85.4 (2.9) A 64.9 (3.5) F 84.6 (1.1) AB 
    4 mm Bulk Fill51.3 (2.6) G64.5 (1.3) F 78.5 (1.6) CD 71.0 (2.3) E 78.7 (3.1) BCD
    N= 5 specimens per condition. Values in cells identified with similar upper case letters are not significantly different.