Triclosan Microparticles for Antifungal Denture Bases
Objectives: Add triclosan-microparticles to three commercial acrylic-resins to evaluate its antifungal effect and cytotoxicity. Methods: Triclosan-microparticles were analyzed by Scanning Electron Microscopy. Three acrylic-resins were used: OptiCryl®(conventional-thermopolymerization), Nature-Cryl® and EZ-Cryl® (microwave-polymerization). Two groups of each acrylic-resin were performed; the first by following the manufacturer’s-instruction and the second by adding triclosan-microparticles (3%). The antifungal assay was performed by the preparation of disks (n=10) of 10mmx2mm in size of each acrylic-resin. Candida albicans cultures were prepared of 2x105 CFU/ml and placed in 24-well plates. Each sample were placed in the culture (48h, 37ºC); after that, the Candida solution was placed in an authomatic counter to know the difference of Colony-Forming Unit, to assess the antifungal effect of each group. The positive control was Candida culture with fungizone. The cytotoxicity was evaluated by the MTT-assay using mouse fibroblast cell-line at 24h. One-Way ANOVA was applied. Results: The micrography showed irregular-large particles of Triclosan with 15x50micrometers in size. The results for the antifungal evaluation were: OptiCryl® and Nature-Cryl® presented the lower Candida proliferation (1.7x105CFU), showing significant difference (p<0.05) to EZ-Cryl® with (2.1x105CFU). The groups with triclosan presented the same behavior but with different values: OptiCryl® and Nature-Cryl® presented the lower Candida albicans proliferation (1.6 and 1.4x105CFU-respectively), showing significant difference (p<0.05) to EZ-Cryl® with (2.0x105CFU). The MTT-assay showed no significant difference (p>0.05) for all-groups. Conclusions: The addition of tricosan-microparticles (3%) decrease the Candida albicans proliferation in OptiCryl® and Nature-Cryl® and they were no-cytotoxic to cultures cells, indicating that Triclosan is a well antifungal agent when used in this proportion for denture bases.Acknowledgements: Projects (DGAPA-UNAM): PAPIIT-TA200414, PAPIME-PE202214; CONACyT-Mexico(CB176450), Dra. Genoveva Hernández-Padrón and Dra. Marina Vega.
Division: IADR/AADR/CADR General Session
Meeting:2015 IADR/AADR/CADR General Session (Boston, Massachusetts) Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Year: 2015 Final Presentation ID:2156 Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s):Dental Materials 5: Biocompatibility and Biologic Effects
Authors
Torres-lopez, Martha
( Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
, Leon
, Mexico
)
Montaño-vargas, Jessica
( Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
, Leon
, Mexico
)
Nuñez-anita, Rosa
( Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo
, Morelia
, Mexico
)
Arenas-arrocena, María
( Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
, Leon
, Mexico
)
De La Fuente-hernandez, Javier
( Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
, Leon
, Mexico
)
Acosta-torres, Laura Susana
( Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
, Leon
, Mexico
)