IADR Abstract Archives

Compressive Strength of Pressed Lithium Disilicate Crowns Supported by Various Core Materials: An In Vitro Evaluation

Objectives: The purpose was to compare the compressive strengths (MPa) of pressed lithium disilicate crowns supported by core materials, amalgam and composite to a positive control.
Methods: Thirty (n=30) extracted molars that fit the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into three (3) groups of ten (n=10); a control group and two experimental groups and mounted in acrylic. The two experimental groups were prepared operatively to remove both buccal cusps that were replaced with direct restorative materials; amalgam (n=10) and composite (n=10). All thirty specimens were then prepared to receive a full coverage pressed lithium disilicate (eMax) crown (all margins in enamel). The margins were marked and sent to the laboratory for crown fabrication. Once returned, all crowns were evaluated for marginal integrity and cemented with a self-etching dual cure resin luting agent. The compression test was carried out using an Instron mechanical testing machine. The data was expressed as group means (MPa) ± standard deviations and compared with analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Results: According to the analysis of variance, there was no statistically significant difference (α = .05) between the composite core group (325 MPa ± 35) and the amalgam core group (315 MPa ± 40) when compared to the control (330 MPA ± 36). Therefore, the null hypothesis could not be rejected for this project.
Conclusions: Amalgam and composite core materials supporting a pressed lithium disilicate all ceramic crown achieved the same compressive strength as natural tooth structure. It appears from this study that amalgam and composite both can be used as an adequate structural foundation for esthetic pressed lithium disilicate crowns.
Division: IADR/AADR/CADR General Session
Meeting: 2015 IADR/AADR/CADR General Session (Boston, Massachusetts)
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Year: 2015
Final Presentation ID: 3687
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Dental Materials 3: Ceramic-based Materials and Cements
Authors
  • Hill, Ira  ( University of Louisville School of Dentistry , Louisville , Kentucky , United States )
  • Zandinejad, Amir  ( University of Louisville School of Dentistry , Louisville , Kentucky , United States )
  • Metz, Michael  ( University of Louisville School of Dentistry , Louisville , Kentucky , United States )
  • Financial Interest Disclosure: University of Louisville School of Dentistry
    SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    Mechanical Properties
    Saturday, 03/14/2015 , 03:30PM - 04:45PM
    TABLES
    Descriptive Statistics: Core Strength (MPa)
    N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval
    for Mean - Lower Bound
    95% Confidence Interval
    for Mean - Upper Bound
    Minimum Maximum
    Control 10 363.1000 7.40045 2.34023 357.8060 368.3940 353.00 375.00
    Resin Core 10 364.1000 9.91576 3.13564 357.0067 371.1933 355.00 380.00
    Alloy 10 361.5000 12.56317 3.97282 352.5128 370.4872 345.00 377.00
    Total 30 362.9000 9.88328 1.80443 359.2095 366.5905 345.00 380.00

    Inferential Statistics: Core Strength (MPa) - ANOVA
    Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
    Between Groups 34.400 2 17.200 0.166 0.848
    Within Groups 2798.300 27 103.641
    Total 2832.700 29